Cancer needs sugar. One of the primary ways they detect cancer is via a PET-CT with a radioactive glucose tracer. It lights up where glucose uptake is the highest. This article talks about starving cells going into defensive repair mode, but also about how energy-hungry cancer cells are. I had cancer (lymphoma) and did three years of chemo (mostly maintenance/preventative, as it was wiped out in the first couple mont…
Fasting improves chemotherapy results and protects from side effects: study
181–190 of 219 posts
Re: Fasting improves chemotherapy results and protects from side effects: study
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
"bullshit", "quackery", ""healers" and witches" Is all that really necessary? When it comes to human health, the unknowns are legion. Medical science is in its infancy, but too many act as though it's a mature discipline built upon rock-solid theories with few problems. 20 years ago, I noticed that my mental fog cleared up and I felt healthier when I ate very low carb, I looked to pioneers like Atkins and others who…
The food pyramid was never backed by any high quality evidence. It was primarily pushed by various agriculture lobbies. Calories in calories out is 100% valid for weight loss. The problem is that people interpret it to somehow be a claim on overall health when it is just a statement on weight gain and loss, which while can be beneficial to health, isn't everything. A calorie is just a calorie, so much as color is col…
Re: Fasting improves chemotherapy results and protects from side effects: study
#183Re: Fasting improves chemotherapy results and protects from side effects: study
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
If I'm reading this correctly, the "harm from chemo" to the person was about the same, but the "harm from chemo" to the cancer was much more significant in the fasting group.
Yes. But there are alternative healing ideas that fasting and juicing in themselves can cure cancer.
Re: Fasting improves chemotherapy results and protects from side effects: study
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have fasted 100 lbs away over the last 2 years. I adhere to an 18/6 time delay eating schedule but have done 2-3 day fasts with 1 refeed meal for a month at a time. I've also done countless 5-7 day fasts. I've gone as long as 12 days with nothing but water. There were many months where I could count the number of times I ate on one hand. My last go was every other day with just one meal on my eating days. I did tha…
My understanding (and experience) is that this clarity is usually just about the lack of all the crap that normally makes you feel awful. Things like sugar, dairy, and processed grains plus preprocessed foods. I've always found that after 10 days, you start to feel amazing and do so for around two weeks more before your body starts to adjust.
On top of this, once you use up all your glycogen, your body enters a period of autophagy which causes disfunctioning cells and protein fragments to become broken down and reused. This causes your body to function more efficiently, including your brain.
Re: Fasting improves chemotherapy results and protects from side effects: study
#186Earlier quoted context omitted.
I forgot but let me try: - cancerous cells often break the mitochondria forcing cell into a secondary respiration mode - they also trigger vascular growth but chaotically - since the cell is in this alternative respiration, they don't need normal arteries to get energy so the chaotic arterial network they grow is not a problem - IIRC this network also impedes chemotoxins to reach the cell as fast as normal cells - if…
Good stuff. Also of note is tumor heterogenity. Not only are cancers different between cell origin and across different patients, cancer is not one uniform genetic entity even inside a single person. Why? The cancer's ability to repair DNA mutations is crap, so different chunks of tumor can rapidly evolve different mutations. You might be able to drug one portion of the tumor based on a fancy receptor/biomarker, but…
I've read not too long ago that a tumor is actually mostly an outer layer of active cells, the inner is made up of dead tumors probably serving as nutrient (<= very blurry on this). yet another part of that strange anti-life living form named cancer.
Re: Fasting improves chemotherapy results and protects from side effects: study
#187Earlier quoted context omitted.
Absolutely. Let's look at the claims. What is the first claim though? Is it that extraordinary evidence needs to be provided for the claim that a poison (chemotherapy) is a cure for cancer? You will likely say that there is evidence in "multiple strong, well-vetted and well respected studies in peer-reviewed journals". But then I would question the authority of peer-reviewed journals. Do know about replication crisis…
> Is it that extraordinary evidence needs to be provided for the claim that a poison (chemotherapy) is a cure for cancer? Let's start by not conflating all kinds of cancer and all kinds of chemotherapy, because it's not a single disease, and the outcomes vary greatly. But, for instance, survival rates for testicular cancer have risen significantly (or even dramatically) since the invention and introduction of the che…
I don't say that there are no good things coming out of the medical industry. Sometimes there are good things, and when it comes to bodily trauma, I think the medical profession is excellent at stitching people back together again.
But I'm especially interested in wellness and optimal living. I genuinely don't feel the industry has anything to offer on that front. Food is probably the most important 'treatment' we can do, but the industry is pretty silent on this.
My anecdotal experience, is with a relative who was diagnosed with diabetes. It was never explained to them that if they don't eat carbs they won't have the disease - cutting out bread, rice, etc was too 'out there'. The advice was about how to manage the process, cut back a little on the bread, inject insulin etc - the relative ended up on a high level of medication. I think all that could have been avoided by eating appropriately for the disease, advice which that person has taken (a bit) with a corresponding drop in symptoms + medication. To my mind, it is not so radical to cut those foods out of the diet completely if they are harmful!
Its not that doctors intend to be mean or harmful, but they are taught in such a narrow way with medication at the heart of what they do. If they advise 'off menu' they stand to lose their license. The medical industry is in fact captured and beholden to big pharma.
Did you even know that there are alternative theories of disease? Namely - the terrain theory (Beauchamp). That what you eat and how you live is the main cause of disease. That disease (of all sorts) is a natural bodily process, as your body tries to heal - including cancer. Eg, at a lower level, when you have a cold, this is your body clearing your system. There is mucus and a fever. The worst thing to do is to take medication to suppress this process - but that is the first thing most of us will do.
Anyway, for that and other reasons, I find the terrain theory makes a lot of sense, and it is something that does not require an intermediary to tell you what you need to do (eg a doctor, testing, etc). If you get it right you enjoy optimal health. That is the position that I'm arguing from - that food and proper management of what and how we eat (inc breaks such as fasting) is probably the best healer. If I were ever seriously ill, my first course of action would be as per my initial comment - a prolonged juice fast.
Cheers
Re: Fasting improves chemotherapy results and protects from side effects: study
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes. But there are alternative healing ideas that fasting and juicing in themselves can cure cancer.
Tell that to Steve Jobs...
Obviously, I'm joking.
But did you know that iatrogenic deaths - deaths caused by doctors - are the 3rd largest cause of death in the US?
And when you see the numbers, bear in mind that these are only the official reported numbers! I can only imagine how many other deaths must be caused by doctors but get explained as natural deaths.
Re: Fasting improves chemotherapy results and protects from side effects: study
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hello! Long time faster here (lost over 80lbs in about 9 months with basically zero exercise). One potential downside to steady regimented fasting _when combined_ with caloric restriction, is a decrease in your basal metabolic rate (BMR). Our bodies are very good at adapting to "the new normal" and will optimize itself to function on the fuel you give it. This is true in both directions. If you eat less, your body wi…
> One potential downside to steady regimented fasting _when combined_ with caloric restriction, is a decrease in your basal metabolic rate (BMR). Check out The Complete Guide to Intermittent Fasting. The research he cites shows that the effect you describe occurs in caloric restriction diets, not fasting. Fasting increases HGH and maintains BMR. Perhaps what you are describing is the early days of fasting when your b…
Fasting enables us to not have to focus on calorie restrictions to see a reduction in body weight. However, if you only eat 500 calories a day, eventually you will run out of fat and your BMR will go down as you approach a lower BMI.
It's a very slow and gradual process, but it does happen. If you've got plenty of fat to burn, not a huge issue, but as you lose weight it can start to apply more.
Anecdotal evidence also suggests that people who stick with a very strict IF schedule tend to see slower results and bigger plateaus than those who change things up more often.
Re: Fasting improves chemotherapy results and protects from side effects: study
#190Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hello! Long time faster here (lost over 80lbs in about 9 months with basically zero exercise). One potential downside to steady regimented fasting _when combined_ with caloric restriction, is a decrease in your basal metabolic rate (BMR). Our bodies are very good at adapting to "the new normal" and will optimize itself to function on the fuel you give it. This is true in both directions. If you eat less, your body wi…
It sounds like we are both doing the same thing but through different means. I have been on a successful low-carb, high-fat diet for around 7 years now and will never go back to eating high-carb foods on a daily basis. I lost 45 pounds in the first 9 months with no exercise and have kept it off since. Although the weight loss was nice, it was not my main goal. I originally changed to a LCHF diet because I was tired o…
One way I've gotten through this recently is to use a pre-packaged meal delivery service. I order 30 meals at a time for $175 and that lasts me a month or so eating 2 per meal, 4-5 days a week. If I'm hungry, my food options are what's in the freezer, or a bag of popcorn.
I've found one of my biggest motivators for fasting is actually the pride I get from discussing it with friends and family. I'm not a prideful person, but it feels freaking great to boast nonchalantly about not having eaten food in a few days. The results also speak for themself as well.
If you don't have a fasting tracker app, I recommend finding one you like and trying to get some others on board. If you're interested, I have a group from posts on my blog that people hop in and out of [0]. Anyone feel free to join and post updates and I'll keep an extra close eye on it for the next few days.