Live data from Hacker News

An update on a pre-registered result about the coronavirus

kalzumeus.com

181–182 of 182 posts

Re: An update on a pre-registered result about the coronavirus

#181

>We project a true count of over 500,000 infections, including more than 5,000 severe cases, and a breakdown in provision of care (“overshoot”) in Nagoya, Osaka, and Tokyo, before the end of April. The current count is ~21,000 with the number of confirmed daily cases declining for 6 days straight, from 741 to 338 yesterday. So... not only wrong on the numbers themselves, but also on the scale, trajectory and impact o…

It's not too harsh. It seems pretty clear to me the blasé conclusion that essentially "things are gonna get much worse in a month" (no duh) was loosely backfilled with numbers after the conclusion was already made.

Writing in a circuitous manner may have been necessary due to the author's immigration status but it's also a very convenient smokescreen that makes his group's results look more dramatic.

For example, the timeline for March 24th, the day before this epic whitepaper was released: "a sporting event is postponed." This "sporting event" was the Tokyo OLYMPICS! But showing that Japan was already starting to take COVID-19 a lot more seriously than some of their public pronouncements may lead you to believe before the whitepaper release date might undercut the article's implication that his whitepaper changed the public narrative and thus the author would be less deserving of asspats and clout.

I've heard people say that this pandemic highlights the (unfortunate) severe lag time of real-life discourse to Twitter's discourse (what is "known" on Twitter versus public narrative).[^1] From that angle this report could be a good thing to try to short-circuit that gap. My opinion is the attempt failed (more accurately their conclusion was already stale), and this writeup brings it right back around to the worst parts of Twitter's discourse - personal brand marketing and clout-chasing.

[^1]: While that's undoubtedly true, Twitter also generates a massive amount of garbage takes which are conveniently forgotten through severe selection bias (looking back with hindsight to see who was right is easy). Online takes also have zero cost compared to reality; you can throw infinite virtual darts at a dartboard but in reality you can steer your meat machine down only one path. Thus there will always be a lag between the two.

Re: An update on a pre-registered result about the coronavirus

#182
post #149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

While I appreciate what you're trying to say here, your point is orthogonal to the discussion. The original comment was about the tone of patio11's post and the assertion that an anonymous white paper significantly altered policy decisions of one of the world's most technologically, scientifically, and academically advanced countries. The response the original commenter got from barry-cotter was to "shut up and liste…

> The response the original commenter got from barry-cotter was to "shut up and listen to your betters" because the commenter wasn't a "certified expert" followed by a rant that could have come straight from an episode of Coast to Coast AM. I apologize for a lack of clarity in my writing but not for being very, very pissed off. I assumed it was obvious that I was paraphrasing kspacewalk in the bit about one’s betters…

About Singapore I wouldn’t be sk sure
Post reply on HN