Live data from Hacker News

Pi-Hole 4.3.2

pi-hole.net

181–190 of 224 posts

Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2

#181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"But what about my business model? Don't you know I have an inalienable right to it?"

How is that any different from someone thinking they have an inalienable right to any article/website they want?

If your server sends bits back to my computer when I request them, it is perfectly within my right to decide which of those bits I do and do not want to see.

Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2

#182
post #143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yep, my experience as well. There must be a better way. I think we're warming up for a war since browsers (Chrome and Safari at least) have slowly started making it harder to block ads, which I think will becoming a creeping normality.

DoH in Firefox will bypass your pihole too and have all your DNS data go to cloudflare to boot.

Why couldn't pi-hole answer over http as well? You would also be able to use it from outside your home, without leaking your DNS traffic, or risking interception.

Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2

#183
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It has an API. > You can craft a URL that disables pi-hole for X minutes, using the API. You hit the boomark and boom, pi-hole temporarily disabled. If you save it to your phone's home-screen, you've got an instant disable button.

Man, it would be nice if there were a native app for iOS which you could link to multiple Pi-Holes for easy management and/or Siri Shortcuts. I'd definitely drop a few bucks for that app - and I'm sure a few others would too! Please DM me if anyone is working on it and needs a beta tester via Test Flight.

Pretty sure Shortcuts interacts with APIs, you could just drop that into a “choose from menu” thing when you activate the shortcut

Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have 2 Pi-Holes running. One is the “family” one and our modem/router uses it as primary DNS so basically everything on our network goes through it. This protects the family and any visitors in the wifi. The other is for me, and my personal devices have been manually set to use it as their DNS. It filters a lot more aggressively as I am more willing to put up with broken stuff for more privacy (eg completely blocki…

This is the perfect solution in my opinion. I never considered using more than one!

Easy to do running it containers too!

Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2

#185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not for your browsers, no. UBlock Origin is far better than any host-based adblocker. I use pihole to block ads inside apps, it's unmatched for that.

That would be a suitable use case, but I don't think I use any apps that contain ads.

It's not just ads in apps, it blocks tracking beacons too. If I connect my (big Chinese manufacturer's) android device to my vps which has the pihole running I can watch as one or two requests per second are blocked with no browser open.

Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2

#186
post #15

Just recently I experimented going without my pi-hole or any ad blocker software for 4 weeks to see what would happen. My goodness the internet is a dumpster fire without it. So many pages lagging and slow to load. Things I wanted to click that jumped when an ad loaded resulting in miss clicks. Annoying things following me around. It was especially bad on mobile with the GDRP/Cookie notices and ad's to the point that…

Is there any special reason to use pi-hole + adblocker? Why just to not use one of them?

Adblockers can block specific paths/URLs, where Pi-Hole is DNS level only.

Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2

#187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"But what about my business model? Don't you know I have an inalienable right to it?"

How is that any different from someone thinking they have an inalienable right to any article/website they want?

Make plain, no funny-business HTTP GET, server responds 200 and sends some text. Guess they wanted me to have it. I'll decide what I do with it, thanks.

Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2

#188
post #143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yep, my experience as well. There must be a better way. I think we're warming up for a war since browsers (Chrome and Safari at least) have slowly started making it harder to block ads, which I think will becoming a creeping normality.

DoH in Firefox will bypass your pihole too and have all your DNS data go to cloudflare to boot.

You can disable that; both at a network level, and in the browser itself. You can also choose a different DoH provider if you don't want to use cloudflare.

Yes, it should be disabled by default but it not the end of the world. I would hazard a guess that when Chrome implements something similar that it won't be so easy to disable.

Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2

#189
post #15

Just recently I experimented going without my pi-hole or any ad blocker software for 4 weeks to see what would happen. My goodness the internet is a dumpster fire without it. So many pages lagging and slow to load. Things I wanted to click that jumped when an ad loaded resulting in miss clicks. Annoying things following me around. It was especially bad on mobile with the GDRP/Cookie notices and ad's to the point that…

Maybe don't use pi-hole and just stop visiting sites that disrespect their users?

You don't really miss out on anything and actually reward proper sites.

Re: Pi-Hole 4.3.2

#190
post #50

The one thing that's holding me back on actually using Pi-Hole is the lack of flexibility. What I'd really like to see is the ability to do various things on a per-client basis. For example, one commenter wanted a simple "reload without blocking" functionality and the response was to use a bookmarklet plus the Pi-Hole API to disable it temporarily. This works, but the problem is that it disables it temporarily for ev…

Pihole is just a GUI on top of dnsmasq, they're not doing anything fancy, apart maybe for the extra statistics. These are some interesting ideas for improvement, I'd also be interested in something with more flexibility, but I'm not sure if there's an alternative at the moment.

The pf-blockerNG package on pfSense would be the next level up. Not as pretty as pinhole, but far more capable if you are willing to stick with it. And you don't have to use pfSense as your firewall/gateway if you don't want to - pfSense will work just find with only one interface as an application appliance purely for running pf-blockerNG to use as your internal DNS server.
Post reply on HN