Live data from Hacker News

Information operations directed at Hong Kong

blog.twitter.com

181–190 of 480 posts

Re: Information operations directed at Hong Kong

#181

Maybe one day our cyberpunk corporate overlords will be able to fine governments for this kind of shit.

Ain't gonna happen. In reality, our cyberpunk overlords will fall over themselves to provide the best level of service to the highest paying autocratic government customers.

Is there a meaningful difference between a "fine" levied on the state by a firm and a fee the state pays the firm for a service? I'm reminded of Joe Nacchio... there's a guy who didn't understand this business.

Re: Information operations directed at Hong Kong

#182
post #42

Good on Twitter and Facebook. On top of blocking thousands of websites (which includes Facebook, Google, Twitter) China's government employs thousands of government employees just to purge even the most mild criticism of the CCP on Weibo [1]. They also employ tens of thousands to export their propaganda overseas, using sock puppet accounts to push their worldview[2]. And their worldview is fiercely anti-democratic. T…

>The Internet cannot remain free if we allow governments to use their power to control narratives and suppress the truth. I wish more people applied this same line of reasoning towards the US-based social media companies themselves. If we hold true that Twitter's influence is so powerful that world superpowers are gaming it effectively to control narratives, then why aren't people more outraged at the near constant c…

Both parties aren't perfect but compared to state media, great firewall, social credit, kidnapping, and concentration camps it's weird to point out the shortcomings of Western social media companies.

Re: Information operations directed at Hong Kong

#184
post #95

My YT overlord lately decided I should watch Jackie Chan commentates about the situation in Hong-Kong [0]. I was very surprised to see the English comments almost unanimously support China. Would have expected the opposite sentiment. [edit: stupid me, the uploader is CGTN, a well-known state propoganda channel] [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7rIg49I0yI

Jackie Chan has a very pro-China stance. In his autobiography, he mentions that he is proud to be Chinese, and makes several associations to Chinese culture, seemingly over Hong Kong.

I found it to be a curious position, seeing as he is adored by Hong Kongers, and always seemed to identify as / with HK.

Re: Information operations directed at Hong Kong

#185
post #23

I don't think HN is immune to these kinds of CCP ops.

The problem is that calling someone a paid, or unpaid shill on HN is unproductive. There's a world of difference (But little way for a third party to tell apart) between: A paid shill. An unpaid troll. Someone who genuinely believes what they are posting, because they do not have the same information you do. Someone who genuinely believes what they are posting, despite having the same information as you, because they…

The difference between a paid person and an unpaid person may not be so large. I heard from someone who looked into the anti-vax accounts on Facebook (in ~2013, when the comments on HN about this news would have been about preserving free speech on Twitter rather than good on them for doing this) that she found some people believed it so strongly that they wrote bots to respond to public messages that use certain keywords. These weren't government sockpuppets, they were concerned citizens.

I'm pretty sure this was the podcast where I heard that: https://samharris.org/podcasts/145-information-war/ (Relatively near the beginning of where the guest comes into the podcast, if I remember correctly.)

Re: Information operations directed at Hong Kong

#186
post #132
post #122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hong Kong has independent jurisdiction system. So yes, they are living under a system where due process is respected.

What's that worth to Hong Kongers when they can simply be renditioned to Beijing? Does it make sense to you why Americans were extremely upset when the US government did that to people in foreign countries during the Bush administration?

First, they cannot be renditioned. That's what this protest is about.

Yes. It is upset. It is also upsetting that the U.S. actually have limited due process as well (thus, can forfeit the asset without due process). There are practical reasons why, but it is still ideologically upsetting.

Re: Information operations directed at Hong Kong

#187
post #119
post #32

Was in China when the first protest happened and the news coverage was mostly saying things like that the people are clueless in Hong Kong and don’t understand the law about extradition. They had various experts all saying similar things and they would also point to random weibo posts about totally not on the payroll “people” saying they want their city back from the protesters.. I mean it’s one thing if China’S cent…

> but dressing it up as “lots of ordinary folks agree with them” is pretty disingenuous I wouldn't say it's disingenuous... given that there's nothing legally preventing mainland-Chinese from choosing to live in HK, and then being quoted as people who want "their" city back. Odd to think, but HK is now experiencing a real Red Scare , the likes of which the US only ever imagined in the depths of paranoid delusion. The…

there's nothing legally preventing mainland-Chinese from choosing to live in HK

This is completely wrong.

Mainland-Chinese may only move to Hong Kong to reunite with family, and they have to apply for a One-Way Permit, which has a "quota of 150 people per day and the waiting time for spouses is currently 4 years": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Republic_of_China_P...

To even visit Hong Kong requires applying for an Entry-Exit Permit in person, and duration is typically limited to 7 days: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exit-Entry_Permit_for_Travelli...

Re: Information operations directed at Hong Kong

#188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right. This part of the work is left to the foreign-living chinese nationalistic diaspora. They get their directions from the CCP nonetheless. Again, for casual readers: Chinese people in the US who don't support squashing democracy fighters in HK (I think/hope that's the vast majority of them - maybe more hope now that I'm being downvoted) are awesome.

Devils advocate. Perhaps it's less they get directions and more they actually hold those views. Which, we could say is because brainwashing since youth and perhaps there is some truth to that. But I think likely the biggest thing is the same thing that motivates everyone else. Self interest. They want to see an expanded China with greater say in world events and greater share of the economic pie. Because it would ben…

[deleted]

Re: Information operations directed at Hong Kong

#189
post #88
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your basically complaining that paper can be used to write whatever you want on it, by you and by people you don't like.

Not even close to an accurate comparison. It's not just paper - it's a printing press that can push your message directly to a device into the pocket of people who belong to specific groups that you want to target.

How is that different from spreading false information through newspapers when that was the primary source of people's information?

Re: Information operations directed at Hong Kong

#190
post #160
post #152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even here on Hacker News, a week or so ago I saw someone being chided for “breaking the HN guidelines” by calling out a sock puppet. When I looked at the comment history of the account doing the chiding, all of its comments were on China related articles, taking a pro-China view.

There are two site guidelines that apply to this. First, it's not ok to use HN primarily for political, ideological, or national battle. If a commenter is posting as you describe, we ask them to stop. Example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20727426 . But by no means does it follow that a commenter behaving that way must be a sockpuppet, astroturfer, shill, spy, foreign agent, etc. That's where the second guide…

>First, it's not ok to use HN primarily for political, ideological, or national battle.

You need to up the Karma req for downvotes.

@Dang, Look at my current comment hist... I provide a valuable perspective. Even if others disagree with me.

YC as a greater community is greater than the sum of its (unicorn) parts.

Stop fucking censoring people for some lame idealogical moral standard which you dont even meet yourselves.

We are here to learn, to teach, to expand one fucking thing "KNOWLEDGE" stop knowBlocking (just coined that haha)

Post reply on HN