Live data from Hacker News

The first solar road has turned out to be a disappointing failure

sciencealert.com

181–190 of 349 posts

Re: The first solar road has turned out to be a disappointing failure

#181

Hmm... Can we just applaud that people are trying something new? Or are we going to shoot it down because of pessimism? If you know so well what works, then do your best and make it happen or write a guide on how to do experiments that almost always lead to success. They didn’t fail fast, but they failed with relatively little costs. What is 5 million to the national GDP of France? It seems to me they were trying som…

Yeah, this is how I see it too. It was an experiment. It failed. Things were learned from deploying it into a real-world environment. This may contribute in some way to a future technology, as often happens. HN of course is full of people who are experts on every topic, so naturally there was no need to actually perform this experiment. They could have just accurately predicted its faults and performance from theoriz…

Unlike in dropbox case, this is something people with engineering degrees that often include physics and material sciences can actually calculate.

Re: The first solar road has turned out to be a disappointing failure

#182
post #122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The advantage that people wanted to get is that in the end you also get a road. Roads take up space, cost money to build and maintain. If you build it next to the road the road need twice the amount of space and still require the space, construction and material for the actually road. If you build it above the road you get all the issue of overhead roof on a road (trees that fall on it, wind, height limitation). In a…

> That it currently do not work economically is the issue that the article showcase. It's more than that. We simply don't live in a world where physics is in favor for doing this. Many people have done more than back of the envelope calculations to show this simply was a non starter. Those (people who took money to build ) push this idea are either ignorant at best and dishonest at worst.

I do wonder if the concept could work on a sidewalk, given that they aren't being perpetually driven over by 3,000+ pound vehicles.

Re: The first solar road has turned out to be a disappointing failure

#183
post #145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not really. Bromide and chlorine are okay for humans to consume. Sunlight turns these into to bromate which is a carcinogen. https://www.sciencealert.com/here-s-what-s-really-going-on-w...

Okay, but do bromide and chlorine naturally occur in the water in that area? Or was it because of human meddling?

I'm not clear why it matters. Everything natural isn't necessarily good.

Re: The first solar road has turned out to be a disappointing failure

#184
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I find it hard to believe they were really unaware. They either overestimated the durability of their devices or were running a quasi scam.

I know nothing of the details here, so this is total speculation, but I can imagine value in going with a solution you know wont "succeed", if the data you get from the failure is valuable. Like, no need to spend money trying to fix the tractor problem if the leaf problem is too severe. If in practice the leaf problem only deteriorates things by 30%, that's different than 80%, etc. Spending the money to solve problem…

It's possible they did that, but in this case I think it's probably not a good idea.

When you want to launch a new technology it's better to have it do better than expected than to have it run into 'unexpected' problems.

Re: The first solar road has turned out to be a disappointing failure

#185
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> they should put water pipes to utilize the heat Missed by most people is that roads flex under the weight. (Stand next to the train tracks when a train goes by, you'll be startled at how much the ground moves.) Flexing of the roads it the primary cause of road maintenance - cracking and crumbling. Silicon chips in the roadbed, wires, pipes, etc, are all very vulnerable to cracking under bending loads. Putting water…

I know there have been some applications of piezoelectric floors put in places people walk (to generate small amounts of electricity). I wonder if this could have some practical value in roads. The energy would be small, but perhaps it would be enough to keep some distant electronic systems fed.

A solar panel is probably a better option. That's how some illuminated signs and environmental sensors are powered around here.

Re: The first solar road has turned out to be a disappointing failure

#186
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

concrete is a permeable material, solar panels not so much. If you coat your driveway with a resin cover, the stains will probably disappear every time it rains. But nevertheless, it wasn't a talking point before - of course, with enough observation you can think of all possible failure modes beforehand. Sometimes it's easier to just try things out.

But anyone who has read a book about designing a home solar system can tell you that all of the literature tells you that you have to pick the location of your panels carefully so they aren't occluded by trees over part of the year because the power losses due to occlusion are significant and can make a system non-viable and non-economic. From the book I read [0] (although mine is the 2015 edition), not planning for…

> because the power losses due to occlusion are significant and can make a system non-viable and non-economic

That depends on how large the individual cells are and how they're wired up. There are panels that have a pass-through if they're occluded too much to avoid them limiting the output of other cells. It's possible that these panels had compensation mechanisms built-in.

> I'm not sure why they didn't hire an experienced engineer for this multi-million Euro project.

This isn't a few amateurs getting a construction grant and slapping the cheapest off-the-shelf panels they could find onto the pavement.

The panels were built by a French company called Wattway, a subsidiary of Colas, a large French street construction corporation. The parent company also did the construction work of actually putting these things on the street.

Apparently the "Institut National de l'Energie Solaire" was involved in this project as well, which is a public research facility (co-run by a university and the CEA, which has a budget of more than 5 billion Euros, and has a staff of 19k employees and 1200 grad + post-grad students).

That "solar road" might have been part of a research grant for all kinds of PV developments and they had to deliver it as a demonstration. That would also explain to me why they give up so easily. From the article: "Wattway [...] told Le Monde that it would not be going to market."

Re: The first solar road has turned out to be a disappointing failure

#187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Could be worse.[1] Remember the schemes for recovering energy from traffic on sidewalks and roads? Pavegen pivoted to collecting info about people walking on their sidewalks, rather than energy. [1] https://pavegen.com/

>Pavegen pivoted to collecting info about people walking on their sidewalks, rather than energy. Wow. Switching from saving the world, to spying on everybody in it. That's almost a perfect microcosm of how the tech industry seems to have morphed in the last decade.

The four stages of technology:

- innovation

- productization

- marketing

- milking IP

Re: The first solar road has turned out to be a disappointing failure

#188
post #145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not really. Bromide and chlorine are okay for humans to consume. Sunlight turns these into to bromate which is a carcinogen. https://www.sciencealert.com/here-s-what-s-really-going-on-w...

Okay, but do bromide and chlorine naturally occur in the water in that area? Or was it because of human meddling?

[deleted]

Re: The first solar road has turned out to be a disappointing failure

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

political stunt wasting funds.. someone clueless decided or was lobbied to pick this thing.

This + quasi-scam. There's a lot of money to be made in the "going green" space and if lying about your product gets you the contract, only the government (citizens) lose and you laugh all the way to the bank. I wish more government contracts had forced warranty / refund clauses (whatever those are called).

You could put those clauses in but the legal entity would simply go bankrupt. You'd need something to go after the principals to make this stick.

Re: The first solar road has turned out to be a disappointing failure

#190
If anybody is disappointed here then they have only themselves to blame. This was dead obvious to anybody with half a working brain and a basic idea of the concepts of road construction, photo-voltaics and general power infrastructure. Doomed to fail and should not have passed the first phase of review for feasibility.

Many of the projects that have not seen the light of day are in that state because they were dumb, not because nobody thought of them before.

Post reply on HN