Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not necessarily just big corporations. https://stallman.org/pay-toilets.html
>Pay toilets are nasty Usually they're pretty nice compared to the free toilets.
Reasons Not to Use Apple (2018)
181–190 of 238 posts
Re: Reasons Not to Use Apple (2018)
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
HAHAHA stop spreading lies. Google uses chrome to spy on people. Here's just a latest example (as with Stallman, you could say that I cherry pick examples, but I assure you I have many many examples like this) At work, completely new computer, new OS. They gave me chrome by default. One night late at the office I go on chrome, go on youtube to listen to ONE single song. Tubular Bells, by Mike Oldfied. 40 minutes or s…
We've had to ask you several times before to stop breaking the site guidelines in your comments here. If you keep doing this, we're going to have to ban you. " Comments should get more civil and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive. " https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Re: Reasons Not to Use Apple (2018)
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s unclear what you mean by this, or what you are using as the criteria for being a pro consumer. Their stance on user privacy, especially with iPhone in comparison to android, is certainly a good example of very pro consumer attitudes.
>It’s unclear what you mean by this, (did you read the article?) Proprietary connectors, overpriced hardware, high cost barrier to entry, closed ecosystem.
And when you use your computer 2,000 hours a year the extra cost of Macs per hour of work is trivial and the benefits are great.
Re: Reasons Not to Use Apple (2018)
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fortunately you can choose Spotify, in fact Apple has distributed thousands of terabytes of Spotify to iOS users for free. And Apple did not lie about your battery, it kept your phone from spontaneously restarting when your battery declined to a pout where it couldn’t generate adequate voltage for the system. Apple just did a poor job of communicating what iOS was doing to prevent this.
What do you mean by "distributed thousands of terabytes of Spotify to iOS users for free"?
Apple has distributed over 300M downloads of Spotify to iOS users, since Spotify is a free app it hasn’t paid a cent for over 30 Petabytes of bandwidth costs.
Re: Reasons Not to Use Apple (2018)
#185> If you carry a cell phone, it tells Big Brother where you are. It's worth remembering that if one carries a mobile telephone, and it is not fully powered off, TPC always knows where you are, and the powers that be do not need to go to Apple for that information. A mobile telephone broadcasts to let the world know where it is, and the mobile telephony system only works in the first place if the system knows how to r…
in the Wiretap Act of 1968 (Title III), it explicitly defined what is a wiretap and who is authorized to perform them and what the legal procedure is. if you read the Wiretap act in the most literal fashion, you will conclude that Title III applies to any communication device which is connected to a network via a physical wire, such as a landline telephone.
https://it.ojp.gov/PrivacyLiberty/authorities/statutes/1284
would you like to know what NSA's interpretation is of the Title III? well, you can't, because it's Secret Law. but I'll give you a hint: cell phones don't connect via wires, therefore, Title III does not apply, therefore NSA can just "read the air" any damn way it pleases, and it doesn't have to tell you, nor tell a Judge, nor tell anybody. NSA just does it. NSA records the entire radio spectrum going over the air. technically, it's not a "wire" tap, since there is no wire. the closest i recall this little legal loophole fib almost coming out during the peak of the Snowden leaks was when (traitor neocon) Sentator Wyden was challenging the NSA in open hearings by giving hints that the NSA was spying on the GPS locations of all cell phones in the US. but nothing ever came of it, Wyden never followed through with leaking any documents nor holding a public hearing.
if you have any doubts, just read the NSA AURORAGOLD slide deck:
https://search.edwardsnowden.com/docs/AURORAGOLDWorkingGroup...
i don't even know what "IR.21" is, some kind of telco protocol thingy like SS7, but NSA targets it and surveils it on every "Mobile Network Operator" (MNO) on the planet. Slide 10: "We Monitor the Industry." NSA spies on the GSM Association in Switzerland. NSA spies on the entire technical staffs of every "MNO" on Earth.
scroll towards the end of the slides where there is a map "network coverage." the whole fucking world of cell phones is "covered" by NSA surveillance. notice anything funny about the map? the US and most FVEYs countries are orange, meaning 1%-20% wireless "coverage." but Africa, inner Asia, and desolate countries are green, which means over 80%.
gee, that's funny. why would NSA's "wireless collection" be so much higher in countries who are marginal American allies and all of whom are rapidly developing economies which went from pre-industrial agrarian, to skipping over industrial, which means they never built a national phone network of wires, and skipped straight to national wireless networks.
it means NSA basically data rapes wireless. it is infinitely easier for NSA to spy on wireless than wired.
but wait! it gets worse. you may ask yourself "okay, fine, NSA steals the air, but i'm a hacker and by flying spaghetti monster i can come up with a technical counter measure. i will develop my own decentralized system to defeat NSA as the global passive adversary."
a few days or weeks later, after you study Mixnets and Meshnets and Delay Tolerant Networks (DTN) and RFC 5050 and after you start prototyping your own off-grid Internet, you come across this slide from the Snowden leaks:
Moving Data Through Disconnected Networks
https://search.edwardsnowden.com/docs/MovingDataThroughDisco...
you slap yourself in the forehead.
shit. NSA has already covered new forms of sneakernets too. of course they have. undetecable decentralized sneakernets are the perfect method of exfiltrating all of the data which NSA is stealing from everyone else in the world, and doing it using their own private off-grid network is ideal because nobody will notice exabytes of your data being siphoned through your fleet of "smart" e-lighbulbs used as a hop point back to Bluffdale.
those NSA slides about DTNs are from around 2011, and it clearly shows NSA had several DTNs operational. they even had a partner program with NRO to develop "CubeSat" nanosatellites to act as nodes in their global exfiltration DTN. and if we know one thing about NSA it's when they're 10 years ahead of everyone else in inventing new defensive tactics, they also invent the offensive tactics to attack that defense, in order to cripple anyone else who might use the same weapons. so of course NSA already has ways to destroy DTNs, in order to prevent anyone else from gaining an advantage over NSA. remember "NOBUS"? Nobody But Us.
Re: Reasons Not to Use Apple (2018)
#186Earlier quoted context omitted.
What do you mean by "distributed thousands of terabytes of Spotify to iOS users for free"?
Apple doesn’t charge developers for providing worldwide distribution across hundreds of app stores. They take 30% of paid app revenues (15% of long term subscriptions). Apple has distributed over 300M downloads of Spotify to iOS users, since Spotify is a free app it hasn’t paid a cent for over 30 Petabytes of bandwidth costs.
Re: Reasons Not to Use Apple (2018)
#187You can call out a multitude of things to be mad at Apple for. The question is, what alternatives currently available would do any better on the whole, for what you need? You demand a phone that has all these services and qualities to it. Or websites or apps that you like. What system have you come up with that provides a viable alternative to what exists? All these social media companies thought they could create a…
https://puri.sm/products/librem-5/
(only for preorder, but the devkit already exists and looks fine)
Re: Reasons Not to Use Apple (2018)
#188> If you carry a cell phone, it tells Big Brother where you are. It's worth remembering that if one carries a mobile telephone, and it is not fully powered off, TPC always knows where you are, and the powers that be do not need to go to Apple for that information. A mobile telephone broadcasts to let the world know where it is, and the mobile telephony system only works in the first place if the system knows how to r…
the Dystopian Orwellian Nightmare is even worse than what Stallman is saying here. First of all, one of the most critical top secrets (ab)used by NSA against us in the Snowden cache has been kept secret from us. in the Wiretap Act of 1968 (Title III), it explicitly defined what is a wiretap and who is authorized to perform them and what the legal procedure is. if you read the Wiretap act in the most literal fashion,…
you HN nerds outta recognize that map. look familiar? see the Lat/Long coords at the bottom. it's the Richmond district in SF. you'd think NSA would be careful to not use US locations as the examples in its surveillance programs, since NSA is not chartered for domestic spying. but you'd be wrong.
'We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors...and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do'.
Re: Reasons Not to Use Apple (2018)
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
What do you mean by "distributed thousands of terabytes of Spotify to iOS users for free"?
Apple doesn’t charge developers for providing worldwide distribution across hundreds of app stores. They take 30% of paid app revenues (15% of long term subscriptions). Apple has distributed over 300M downloads of Spotify to iOS users, since Spotify is a free app it hasn’t paid a cent for over 30 Petabytes of bandwidth costs.
Re: Reasons Not to Use Apple (2018)
#190This is only one item of a larger list. As someone whose university buys Apple products (and uses quite some services on the Stallman's list): does HN have any advice for advocating for making the switch? Let's take Slack as an example: what strategies are there to convince people to make the switch to an alternative product? From the perspective of users (who may not always care about the things RMS cares about), a…
Maybe not precisely that, but https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/university.html