Earlier quoted context omitted.
> "The freedom for a community..." If this was a community decision why is there pushback in LIC? Because, it wasn't a community decision. It was the gov using taxpayer money to subsidize one of the largest most successful companies in the world. Fact: The Gov created the housing bubble. Fact: The Gov created the student loan bubble. Fact: The abatements in __your__ community came out of someone else's pocket. That m…
Ignoring the other facts as guff, this is a common misunderstanding: > The abatements in __your__ community came out of someone else's pocket. That money had to come from somewhere. Abatements are not gifts, they are reductions. The money that was not taken did not have to come from anywhere. The reductions did not amount to a negative total (not even close in my case), and therefore the abatements essentially amount…
Yes. But you make it sounds like the gov services being provided was also reduced. Is that the case? If not, then that means the services being provided still have to be paid for. So if it's not your community, then where do you think that money is coming from?