I'd also be interested to see how many more people just text or IM not talk compared to ten or twenty years ago. If there is a risk from cellphone EM radiation so it must also depend on phone usage and also modern phones emit less EM radiation? For me my main concern is I use my phone as an alarm clock and it's 30cm (1 foot) from my head all night. I also leave it there since it's my main phone so I keep it close to…
Is the EM radiation coming out as directional waves from the phone or is it more like a focused beam between the cell network towers through your skull into your phone? Thanks.
Mobile phone cancer warning as malignant brain tumours double
181–185 of 185 posts
Re: Mobile phone cancer warning as malignant brain tumours double
#182It is curious. I wonder why non-ionizing radiation causes cancer? Given we are constantly bathing in wifi signals and cellphone signals, I wonder what the effects will be?
The strength of those signals is very, very low. WiFi around -60dBm or lower most of the time and the cellular signal where I go is usually well below -80dBm. For comparison, the power received from Earth's nearest star Alpha Centauri A is on the order of -50dBm. If I'm concerned about WiFi and cellular signals I should be positively freaked out about natural sources of em radiation. But having a couple watt transmit…
Re: Mobile phone cancer warning as malignant brain tumours double
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
GBMs kill ~78% of patients within 2 years. Earlier detection wouldn't change the statistics much.
Earlier detection means you find the GBM before the person dies some other way that doesn’t require autopsy.
Though I guess if car crashes were a common cause of death that doesn't require autopsy, you'd see some difference in GBM rates between car heavy places like the US, vs places with better public transit like EU.
Re: Mobile phone cancer warning as malignant brain tumours double
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
Still though, I always have and always will prefer to use my headset when talking on the mobile.
A wired headset, I presume?
Same with headset, I prefer the sound quality.
So none of these choices are made to avoid cancers.
Re: Mobile phone cancer warning as malignant brain tumours double
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
The strength of those signals is very, very low. WiFi around -60dBm or lower most of the time and the cellular signal where I go is usually well below -80dBm. For comparison, the power received from Earth's nearest star Alpha Centauri A is on the order of -50dBm. If I'm concerned about WiFi and cellular signals I should be positively freaked out about natural sources of em radiation. But having a couple watt transmit…
Earth's nearest star is the Sun :-) Which incidentally also emits ionizing photons in the UV zone.