Live data from Hacker News

Steve Jurvetson is out at his own VC firm after allegations of sexual harassment

recode.net

181–185 of 185 posts

Re: Steve Jurvetson is out at his own VC firm after allegations of sexual harassment

#181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

First of all, if you have been on ycombinator for any length of time, you knew this would end up top reply, not downvoted. Secondly, will this is wrong, the main alternative seems to be years of unreported abuse. The men (and it is mostly men) have had years to take these kinds of accusations seriously, and work towards an environment where should accusations could be handled fairly. They have failed at that goal. Wh…

You’re wrong, the post is currently at -2 points and falling. My faith in the lynch mob mentality of today’s environment is well placed. Any hint that even one of these accusations may be false or overblown will be met with immediate negative reactions, despite the fact that little is publicly known about this case other than the consequences for Mr. Jurveston.

There is a percent of false accusations for any kind of crime. However, it is the lowest when it comes to harassment and other anti-women crimes due to enormous costs victims have to pay (in every sense) to raise their voice. It is ridiculous to use unavoidable and very low percent of false accusations as an argument against attempts that victims make to restore justice with no working framework. Currently we don't have proper mechanisms to protect these victims, and in many cases speaking out is the only thing they can do. They shouldn't be blamed for the absence of these mechanisms.

Re: Steve Jurvetson is out at his own VC firm after allegations of sexual harassment

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, that's the point. That this paranoia is bad for women. And the paranoia is all about a man with any element of power interacting with a woman. The first party's sexuality is somewhat relevant, but the latter's doesn't matter at all.

I'm sorry, but that paranoia is pure cowardice. If someone in power cannot meet with someone one on one without attempting anything, then they do not deserve to be in that position, full stop.

> that paranoia is pure cowardice

Sure.

> If someone in power cannot meet with someone one on one without attempting anything

Uh, that's not what the paranoia is. The paranoia is about accusations.

Re: Steve Jurvetson is out at his own VC firm after allegations of sexual harassment

#183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm sorry, but that paranoia is pure cowardice. If someone in power cannot meet with someone one on one without attempting anything, then they do not deserve to be in that position, full stop.

> that paranoia is pure cowardice Sure. > If someone in power cannot meet with someone one on one without attempting anything Uh, that's not what the paranoia is. The paranoia is about accusations.

And I don't buy that. People who aren't sexual predators don't have to worry about that.

Re: Steve Jurvetson is out at his own VC firm after allegations of sexual harassment

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> that paranoia is pure cowardice Sure. > If someone in power cannot meet with someone one on one without attempting anything Uh, that's not what the paranoia is. The paranoia is about accusations.

And I don't buy that. People who aren't sexual predators don't have to worry about that.

> have to worry

Fear isn't rational.

You can't imagine someone in this situation that's excessively worried about a very unlikely but possible occurrence, and acts based on that fear?

Re: Steve Jurvetson is out at his own VC firm after allegations of sexual harassment

#185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And I don't buy that. People who aren't sexual predators don't have to worry about that.

> have to worry Fear isn't rational. You can't imagine someone in this situation that's excessively worried about a very unlikely but possible occurrence, and acts based on that fear?

If they're that driven by fear, they do not deserve to be in that position. And if they're that afraid of it, it's probably because they know they're likely to act in that manner.

I have zero sympathy whatsoever for those cowards, and I extremely abhor the implied insinuation that women won't receive opportunities in the future unless they allow themselves to be harassed and shut up about it.

Post reply on HN