Live data from Hacker News

First field report of iPhone X

wired.com

181–190 of 277 posts

Re: First field report of iPhone X

#181
post #148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am not sure why it is different from any other phone. Yes, unlocking the phone with fingerprint does not require taking your eyes off the road. But aren't your going to look at the screen of the unlocked phone anyway?

Not to use Siri. Not to unlock for my kids in the back to play music.

Siri is activated by side button. Passing a phone to the kids in the back probably more dangerous then glancing at the screen. Don't do it, please.

Re: First field report of iPhone X

#182
post #49

Is ios11 as sucky on it as it is on 6S for me is the real question me thinks.

IOS on the 7 has been rock solid. What is wrong on the 6s?

I have a 6+ and it's been pretty slow since iOS 10. Sucks. Everything else with the phone is great, it's just dog slow now on modern iOS. =(

Re: First field report of iPhone X

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because it can be unlocked in your pocket for SOS use cases. Because it can be unlocked under the table or at a very low angle to be used in places such as a restaurant, meeting room, theater etc. Because one can use TouchID for Apple Pay much quicker and more reliably in a crowded/rushed situation such as paying for public transport. Becuase TouchID actually allows multiple users on the same device if if that is not…

Sure. TouchID can't be used if your fingers are wet or wrinkly. Since I found out about FaceID I've noticed a bunch of scenarios where TouchID falls short and I have to drastically change how I'm using the phone or what I'm doing to accomodate unlocking using a specific finger. > Because one can use TouchID for Apple Pay much quicker and more reliably in a crowded/rushed situation such as paying for public transport.…

> Sure. TouchID can't be used if your fingers are wet or wrinkly.

Sounds like a reason to improve the tech behind TouchID.

Re: First field report of iPhone X

#185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because it can be unlocked in your pocket for SOS use cases. Because it can be unlocked under the table or at a very low angle to be used in places such as a restaurant, meeting room, theater etc. Because one can use TouchID for Apple Pay much quicker and more reliably in a crowded/rushed situation such as paying for public transport. Becuase TouchID actually allows multiple users on the same device if if that is not…

... because it's dark and facial recognition is going to be problematic without an external light source. Or am I off-base?

"Face ID works by projecting more than 30,000 infrared dots onto a face and producing a 3D facial map."[1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Face_ID

Re: First field report of iPhone X

#186
post #155
post #131

Even though the overall tone of this review was upbeat and positive, it seemed that the baseline conclusion was: "hopefully we find a use for the minor iterative improvements that will make this more than just the next release in a series of underwhelming releases." For one of the first, selectively-chosen reviews of what is supposed to be a ground-breaking product, the article essentially told us 1) the pictures loo…

What was so revolutionary about the original iPhone? I don't think anyone could point at any single feature throughout the whole smartphone revolution and claim it was "revolutionary." It was always a combination of features and design decisions that made the phones so easy and pleasant to use. There were many phones before the iPhone that were way more capable, yet nobody talked about them. Siri, TouchID, FaceID, ca…

iPhone was revolutionary because it went full touch screen and went full browser.

The phone as a mini-tablet changed smartphones significantly.

Re: First field report of iPhone X

#187
post #13

Slightly OT: I am most impressed by Apple‘s bold move to drop the iPhone‘s decade old, iconic symmetric design while establishing a new iconic asymmetric design almost over night. As odd as the new design feels, Apple already owns this design, this buckle, this asymmetry. Edit: Why the downvotes (just wondering)?

Apple probably owns the design because most other manufactures hopefully see that you shouldn't be looking at a notch every time you are viewing a video. I've been an iPhone user since day 1 but the screen shape on this phone just makes so little sense. It wouldn't be the worst if Apple made it that iOS scaled everything so media wasn't blocked by the notch but instead if I get the iPhone X I have to wait for app dev…

>I have to wait for app developers to fix the issue

Only the app developers who don't follow the guidelines:

"Don't attempt to hide the device's rounded corners, sensor housing, or indicator for accessing the Home screen by placing black bars at the top and bottom of the screen. "

https://developer.apple.com/ios/human-interface-guidelines/o...

Re: First field report of iPhone X

#188

Face ID is going to be a monumental failure for people who dock their phones on their desk or car. It's also going to annoy everybody who likes things to happen fast all the time because Face ID will definitely cause a delay and frustrate every user at some point. I have no doubt about this. The lack of a home button is probably the worst design decision. They should have gone with dedicated virtual home button or be…

Down votes are unfortunate. I think it is a legitimate concern at this point. I dock my phone in my car and it is far easier to unlock using fingerprint. But I am convinced that Apple is aware of this use case and iPhone X will not be any different.

Re: First field report of iPhone X

#189
post #149

I keep reading about how the "notch" is ugly and annoying, but "you get used to it". Like sitting behind someone with a big hat in the movie theatre, after awhile, you don't even notice. Personally, I change seats in that scenario. I just find it hard square claims of "the future of the smartphone" with reviews like "you get used to it".

Then again... maybe you do get used to it? Like how our parents got "used to" prior technology's "annoyances"? I'm not saying this is a "get off my lawn" annoyance, but... I'm curious to see how phones evolve after this notch.

Everyone got used to OSK's but I'd still prefer a physical keyboard.

Re: First field report of iPhone X

#190
post #176
post #149

I keep reading about how the "notch" is ugly and annoying, but "you get used to it". Like sitting behind someone with a big hat in the movie theatre, after awhile, you don't even notice. Personally, I change seats in that scenario. I just find it hard square claims of "the future of the smartphone" with reviews like "you get used to it".

I don't have the iPhone X yet, but I'm actually kind of excited about the notch and the round corners for a (perhaps) silly reason: it brings us deeper into the sci-fi age where screens are organic objects with shape, rather than just hard, rectangular squares. It feels more exciting, more human, somehow. (Also, all the various status bars will now finally have the same height; basically no software properly responds…

"organic objects with shape, rather than just hard, rectangular squares"

"all the various status bars will now finally have the same height"

Pick one.

Post reply on HN