Earlier quoted context omitted.
"mainstream science maintains that we're neither individuals nor have free will" lol. You haven't even bothered trying to give a definition of what free will is... The definition of which is something for philosophers to debate. What I think you mean to say is, at the level of human perception, mainstream science maintains the universe is deterministic (as opposed to non deterministic (which quantum mechanics might b…
I probably shouldn't be replying to people who end sentences with "lol". But ok, I'll bite. >You haven't even bothered trying to give a definition of what free will is I assume you read the article and we're using that as context in our discussion as people do when they're discussing articles on HN. >The definition of which is something for philosophers to debate. Not really, there are three accepted mainstream philo…
"Actually based on your previous sentence you seem to believe that -- not me." If you really aren't an individual it's not that hard to extend... You are a collection of finite state machines... Same conclusions apply. However as far as people are concerned you might as well assume a "homunculus" theory since the transitions they care about happen inside a first person narrative (for the most part). Kind of like how classical mechanics isn't exactly precisely true, but still best at explaining macroscopic behavior.
"Look into studies done on patients with severed brain hemispheres. It shows you that there is more than one competing selves." It shows you that each half of a brain is capable of qualifying as "human". It does not show you there are two competing selves in humans whose hemispheres are connected. Kind of like sometimes one twin absorbs the other in the womb. I bet if you take a random grown adult, partially lobotomize them, entirely remove half their brain, if they're not completely disabled they'll be more on par with dog than human level intelligence.