Live data from Hacker News

Slack Said to Draw Interest from Amazon

bloomberg.com

181–190 of 236 posts

Re: Slack Said to Draw Interest from Amazon

#181
post #63

One article yesterday suggested that the Amazon non compete lawsuit agaimay their former AWS employee might indicate that they're planning on getting into the business productivity market. With this news that might have credibility

They're already in that market to some extent. https://aws.amazon.com/workdocs/ https://aws.amazon.com/workspaces/

Throw chime in there to which is really good: https://chime.aws/

Re: Slack Said to Draw Interest from Amazon

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"So what's one more thing"

I get that you don't trust Amazon, but if you think they would protect your data less rigorously than Slack you really need to provide a more substantive argument.

Truth be told I love Amazon for the innovation they've brought to most of the industries they've touched but it's like there's some aura of trust around them just because they have brought some of their might against Facebook and Google which seem to be considered the evil twins on HN.

Re: Slack Said to Draw Interest from Amazon

#183
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think of all of those WhatsApp has been the most successful both in terms of moat defense purposes and it still has the potential of turning into something like WeChat or LINE (or what they're doing with FB Messenger itself) with its own monetization. For Skype I think it was mostly about rounding out the office suite, MS doesn't want anyone else getting a toehold in workplace collaboration and expanding from there…

Agreed. These purchases seem to work the best when they're used for defensive purposes and to round out a product offering that already has a substantial userbase . Whatever gadgets they might hang off the app, they're fundamentally a way for people to talk to each other. If you don't have the people, why would you need a slick implementation? As you mentioned, the app would go out of vogue and users would move on. A…

“Amazon making a bid here sounds like a play for a decent social seed, likely steming from users of its core properties (shopping and dev). Of all the mega-corps, Amazon is one of the few that has all the pieces and user-engagement, but no social component.”

Well they do own twitch & good reads, right?

Re: Slack Said to Draw Interest from Amazon

#184

Serious question..... but also more me fleshing out my thoughts on messaging apps.... What is the point in buying a messaging app? - instant messenger - ICQ - Skype - Yammer - WhatsApp They all seem to be popular for a short time and then fad away. What does owing one of these get a company? The case against owning them is that they all go out of favour and you only have a small window, say up to 5 years, where your…

We all asked the same question about Facebook. All social networks before Facebook had faded away. But, Facebook didn't. Potential Slack buyers think that Slack is also here to stay in a similar manner. EDIT: I'm not saying Slack is Facebook. One reason why I think Slack may survive longer than ICQ, Skype etc is how well integrated it is with all other services. For a tool to replace Slack, it should also provide the…

Skype has been going strong for 14 years. It's not impossible of course, but I have my doubts Slack will endure that long in its current form.

Re: Slack Said to Draw Interest from Amazon

#185
post #3

Really believe that Microsoft should have bought Slack. It makes perfect sense for them and aligns with their vision to be the productivity center of everyone's workflow. Microsoft doesnt understand this space at all. Look what they are doing to Skype by making it more like Snapchat when their main use case is business related. Teams also feels so unfinished.

Microsoft is all over the map with collaboration apps—I can't really figure out where their head is at. They have Outlook Groups, GigJam, Teams (their new Slack clone), Sharepoint, and Yammer.

Re: Slack Said to Draw Interest from Amazon

#186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We live in interesting times. Organizations that refuse to use Slack are at a disadvantage. When employees show up and realize there's no Slack, they start to analyze all other company decisions. How much effort could be saved just by using Slack? Those secrets had better be important to justify this loss. There are alternatives. Rocket Chat is self-hosted, and maybe it's sufficient. But second-place software will al…

I consider Slack a negative signal. I would be more likely to want to work at a company that just ran IRC.

I help hire people and consider strong opinions about which chat service is used a negative signal.

Re: Slack Said to Draw Interest from Amazon

#187
post #186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I consider Slack a negative signal. I would be more likely to want to work at a company that just ran IRC.

I help hire people and consider strong opinions about which chat service is used a negative signal.

I don't have a strong opinion, but I do think using Slack shows that a company is vulnerable to chasing hype and eager to hop on bandwagons.

Re: Slack Said to Draw Interest from Amazon

#189

I think it would make much more sense for Apple to acquire Slack. Both companies are known for their emphasis on good design and UX. Slack and Amazon appear to have very difficult cultures, so that would be a very interesting acquisition. If I was an engineer at Slack, I would really, really hope that the company could continue to operate independently, as a subsidiary. I would not be happy if I was forced to work fo…

Slack was known for that, but they compromised very quickly with threaded conversations and the mess that is "slack enterprise grid"

Re: Slack Said to Draw Interest from Amazon

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I get that you don't trust Amazon, but if you think they would protect your data less rigorously than Slack you really need to provide a more substantive argument.

Truth be told I love Amazon for the innovation they've brought to most of the industries they've touched but it's like there's some aura of trust around them just because they have brought some of their might against Facebook and Google which seem to be considered the evil twins on HN.

What's wrong with that? I feel like they've earned a measure of trust. Sure, they're not perfect but no one is.
Post reply on HN