Earlier quoted context omitted.
Declaring "absurd nonsense" isn't an argument.
In this case, the absurdity and nonsensical character of the 'spying' claim is fairly self-evident. When a client voluntarily makes a request to a server, it presents a bunch of information for the server to see and consume. This information is not meant to be kept secret from the server. Among such pieces of information can be some about the characteristics of the user agent, including OS. It is disingenuous at best…
HTTPS on Stack Overflow: The End of a Long Road
181–183 of 183 posts
Re: HTTPS on Stack Overflow: The End of a Long Road
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Many banks have very strict IT policies on posting things on internet Yes, they do. And I really love it. Because it means that MY bank eats their lunch, because the bank I work for actually UNDERSTANDS how to use technology, while still keeping (very!) strict controls.
Would be curious which bank you work for. Most do not seem to value technology--which is odd, since most "cash" only exists as data in a computer somewhere. I'd much prefer to patronize a bank that understands and takes seriously their tech.
And I'm probably biased, but I think we have some pretty great products also (checking accounts with no fees that pays some interest, savings accounts with very good rates, and so forth), so maybe you'll get a good deal as well as a technical focus.
Re: HTTPS on Stack Overflow: The End of a Long Road
#183Funny how the main reason for lack of SSL is said to be the lack of support from 3rd party services... and the first service quoted is ads. https://nickcraver.com/blog/2013/04/23/stackoverflow-com-the...