Live data from Hacker News

Google Earth Redesigned

google.com

181–190 of 292 posts

Re: Google Earth Redesigned

#181

"Google Chrome required" - sure, because current crop of web developers are too young to remember dark age of Internet Explorer domination.

What web technology does this use, specifically, that prevents firefox usage? Or is it just a chrome plugin they decided not to port?

Re: Google Earth Redesigned

#182

"Google Chrome required" - sure, because current crop of web developers are too young to remember dark age of Internet Explorer domination.

What web technology does this use, specifically, that prevents firefox usage? Or is it just a chrome plugin they decided not to port?

Re: Google Earth Redesigned

#185
post #177
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apple Maps does the same thing and was doing it before Google. Interestingly, Apple seems to have better imagery, at least where I am; trees are sharper and more realistic, the ground imagery is more detailed and the colors truer to life. In the forests, trees are rendered clearly enough that I can recognize the landmarks, which just isn't possible in Google's rendering. The only downside is that Google's colors are…

Can I check out Apple Maps in a browser? I'd like to take a look, but I don't have easy access to ios or macos. The screenshots do look fantastic. (Not a criticism of Apple if this isn't possible)

It's possible, although Apple doesn't advertise it or make it real easy to get to. Sharing locations using Apple apps can present a web page, with an embedded map that works fine in a browser:

https://maps.apple.com/place?address=10365%20Gorenflo%20Rd%0...

There have been a couple small indie projects which basically load Apple maps in an iFrame, but I think they've been mostly C&Ded.

Re: Google Earth Redesigned

#186
If any Googlers are reading this: What does the new Earth require that Firefox is missing? I'm happy to help file things in Bugzilla so that this Chrome App can grow into a standards-based Web app.

Re: Google Earth Redesigned

#187

"Google Chrome required" - sure, because current crop of web developers are too young to remember dark age of Internet Explorer domination.

Erm, this product isn't done by some random web developer but google themselves... so yeah, they made another essentially proprietary website.

it honestly sucks but your phrasing puts the blame on inexperienced developers, which most certainly doesn't apply here.

Re: Google Earth Redesigned

#188

"Google Chrome required" - sure, because current crop of web developers are too young to remember dark age of Internet Explorer domination.

What web technology does this use, specifically, that prevents firefox usage? Or is it just a chrome plugin they decided not to port?

["other browsers in the near future"](https://blog.google/products/earth/welcome-home-new-google-e...), so maybe there isn't one?

Re: Google Earth Redesigned

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, I was blown away when I first noticed this. And I was thinking how much this data, which is free for everybody, would be worth in case of a war...

It's not really free. It's free in the sense, that you can browse around, but if you wanted to do some analysis on it, you would need access to the raw bulk data, and this is very expensive. There is free aerial imagery data available (e.g. ESA's Sentinel-2), but it has lower resolution (10m/Pixel). If you want to do the 3D building thing, I estimate you need data with something like 1m/Pixel and from different persp…

San Francisco definitely has resolutions better than 1m/pixel it feels like (for buildings downtown) At least, you can clearly identify segments that would be < 1m across.

Re: Google Earth Redesigned

#190

"Google Chrome required" - sure, because current crop of web developers are too young to remember dark age of Internet Explorer domination.

What web technology does this use, specifically, that prevents firefox usage? Or is it just a chrome plugin they decided not to port?

I remember when inbox launched it could be only used under chrome/chromium. Then somebody changed their user agent in firefox to chrome and magically it started working just fine. So you might want to try that.
Post reply on HN