Live data from Hacker News

YouTube Go: YouTube reimagined for the next generation of YouTube viewers

youtube.googleblog.com

181–190 of 217 posts

Re: YouTube Go: YouTube reimagined for the next generation of YouTube viewers

#181
post #132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you expand more on what it is to be "careful"? What can I do to reduce the data usage when attempting to view a long video?

There is a setting in the YouTube app to only play in SD when not on WiFi but that may only be on Android. It's still not nearly as fine grained as it should be.

On iPhone, YouTube will only play on lowest possible quality on cellular.

Re: YouTube Go: YouTube reimagined for the next generation of YouTube viewers

#182
post #99

So now there's YouTube app (which doens't allow me to listen to a talk offline on an airplane or background or pay for YouTube Red), YouTube Music app (which I'm not allowed to use at all), YouTube Gaming (which has an UI and UX build by a madman). Then there's AndroidTV version of YouTube app which has severe feature limitations and probably some others as well. I don't really like to be negative, but it doesn't see…

And none of these apps allow me to speed up video lectures (1.25x, 1.5x, 2x).

Plus, the "main" YouTube app still insists on displaying a small video with tons of crap around it, so that I have to hunt for the tiny and easy to miss "full-screen" button. I clicked on the video to, you know, watch video, not read the captions under thumbnails from all the other videos YouTube thinks I might want to watch.

Re: YouTube Go: YouTube reimagined for the next generation of YouTube viewers

#183
post #172

So can I finally delete the fortune app from my phone? I think this forced installation of tens of useless Google apps on android is horrible. I don't use their crappy services and I should be able to delete their apps from my phone. And I don't want to root because that invalidates knox in my phone, which I need for office stuff. I'm excited to use this new app but the older one should be deletable.

The "Fortune" app? As you mention knox, I assume this is an app that Samsung force installs on your phone; so I don't really see what Google can do (without locking Android down even more, and I'd rather they didn't). Google is mostly going in the opposite direction and allowing you to uninstall any apps you don't use [1] -- admittedly, the Youtube app is not one of them on my 6P. But, I can disable it so it's not vi…

Fortune was supposed to be YouTube. And I know I can "disable" it. I don't want to disable it, I want to delete it.

Re: YouTube Go: YouTube reimagined for the next generation of YouTube viewers

#184
post #153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

`youtube-dl` is a national treasure. No other tool (except maybe MPV) has made it's way into my day to day usage in years.

mpv is the gold standard in video players. I use both constantly.

What's the difference between mpv and vlc?

Re: YouTube Go: YouTube reimagined for the next generation of YouTube viewers

#185
post #129
post #99

So now there's YouTube app (which doens't allow me to listen to a talk offline on an airplane or background or pay for YouTube Red), YouTube Music app (which I'm not allowed to use at all), YouTube Gaming (which has an UI and UX build by a madman). Then there's AndroidTV version of YouTube app which has severe feature limitations and probably some others as well. I don't really like to be negative, but it doesn't see…

I use Tubex to listen to YouTube in the background. It's free. Not sure about the other features.

Youtube web on firefox for android allows it too. Funny that the mobile browser version works better than the app.

Re: YouTube Go: YouTube reimagined for the next generation of YouTube viewers

#188
post #99

So now there's YouTube app (which doens't allow me to listen to a talk offline on an airplane or background or pay for YouTube Red), YouTube Music app (which I'm not allowed to use at all), YouTube Gaming (which has an UI and UX build by a madman). Then there's AndroidTV version of YouTube app which has severe feature limitations and probably some others as well. I don't really like to be negative, but it doesn't see…

You also forgot the YouTube kids app, which provides no way to filter it more granular than the expected age target so if you downloaded it to let your kids watch a certain show it doesn't matter they'll be on unboxing videos, hacked pirate content, and weird homemade animations in no time.

Re: YouTube Go: YouTube reimagined for the next generation of YouTube viewers

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That always amazes me how pop music passes it. Search for rap song Coco. It's about being love with cocaine and violence and it shows me Kia car ads with families before the video. And some semi amateur authors who TALKED about true crime events were banned from the YouTube adsense partnership.

I don't see that as inconsistent. The term is 'advertiser friendly'. Plenty of advertisers are happy to be associated with popular artists because their popularity gives the advertiser cover. Equally, they might not want to be associated with a small-time true crime channel.

This is a direct avenue for advertisers to control what content is actually available on YouTube. If you want to make money on YouTube you need to make content that advertisers like first and foremost or you get to make no money at all. It's exactly the control they had during the television era. Smells like weak reason as a guise to gain control over the content presented on the site entirely.

Re: YouTube Go: YouTube reimagined for the next generation of YouTube viewers

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't see that as inconsistent. The term is 'advertiser friendly'. Plenty of advertisers are happy to be associated with popular artists because their popularity gives the advertiser cover. Equally, they might not want to be associated with a small-time true crime channel.

The term is not really advertiser friendly. Adsense (also YouTube) TOS makes it very clear ALL the content needs to be family friendly to begin with. Of course, I understand big labels are given an exception but it doesn't make it less hypocritical.

Why is it hypocritical to cut a deal with certain important clients? Even Stallman recommends selling license exceptions to GPL'd code.

Generally speaking, any startup on this site will give preferential treatment to a $50,000/month customer than to a $5/month customer.

Even your bank will treat you differently if you want to open an account with a deposit of $2 million than if you want to deposit $25.

I don't think "hypocritical" is the right word, since Youtube isn't making a moral judgment. They'd take any money they could if their partners would let them.

Post reply on HN