My experience with Ansible has not been so pleasant. Especially performance is a jobstopper. In my environment it takes 20 min for 12 Servers to be setup with some Redis, Elasticsearch stuff. Quite some become_user directives, but 20 min for this kind of stuff is just not acceptable. After all, application settings needs to be tuned and iterated over, too. My idea was to develop the infrastructure with Ansible, e.g.…
If you're using Ansible for orchestration, you could try using the cloud's orchestration service instead. e.g. Rackspace Cloud Orchestration, AWS Cloudformation etc. In this specific case, you can use the orchestration api to spin up and manage the servers, and use ansible to manage the software (although there is a way to manage software as well [0]; I'm just not familiar enough with it to suggest it) Disclaimer: I…
Red Hat is buying Ansible
181–186 of 186 posts
Re: Red Hat is buying Ansible
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
Either it's a strange coincidence or someone spent a lot of time and care creating astroturfing accounts. All are old, have comments and submissions, seem like real people.
They all appear to have suspiciously low karma and durations of consistent activity. I think someone cough went to a lot of trouble..
Re: Red Hat is buying Ansible
#183This clearly is much more about Tower, consultancy, etc, than their main product, but their yaml encoded language is an abomination; masquerading as 'declarative' and easy to read, yet piling on loops and conditional statements and an unintuitive inheritance tree of global and local variables.
I think when ansible started it wasn't obvious that logic (loops, conditional etc...) would be needed eventually. By the time it became obvious it was going to be required, it was too late to change. Using jinja2 for markup compounded the issue in my opinion, as it has no loops and logic is less than obvious (compared to mako for example). Still I find its agentless model, the idempotent model, being able to use it o…
isn't a loop?
Re: Red Hat is buying Ansible
#184I think the price point here is about a couple of things: - Chef and Puppet are too expensive for most companies to acquire, and have too much operational cost for too little revenue - Ansible got a strong following in the SMB space, Red Hat probably thinks they can move that upmarket some - Ansible's agentless configuration management has potentially strong applicability in a container world (why do I need a chunky…
Redhat and Mirantis are now direct competitors in the Openstack world. Redhat buying ansible, among the the great points you made, will further solidify their position in the Openstack world against Mirantis going forward...
Re: Red Hat is buying Ansible
#185Alessandro
Re: Red Hat is buying Ansible
#186If ansible is worth 100 what is saltstack worth?
Are you implying it's worth more or less? Or not implying anything but hoping someone here has an answer or analysis?