Live data from Hacker News

A “simple” 3rd grade problem

math.stackexchange.com

171–174 of 174 posts

Re: A “simple” 3rd grade problem

#171
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It depends. In algorithm classes, there are often many right answers, including ones you haven't thought of before. Same goes for most college math.

"In algorithm classes, there are often many right answers" I accept this, but I'm assuming the original algorithm that a creative student produces will pass tests/produce same output as the 'textbook' solution. My understanding of the original article is that a correct final answer was marked wrong. "Same goes for most college math." Absolutely. My favourite from 16+ maths (GCSE in UK) is the area of a trapezium. Mos…

The third option would be to chop off both "wings" and consider it as a square plus two triangles. That is often my instinct when I forget to do it with the mean length of the parallels.

Re: A “simple” 3rd grade problem

#172
post #85
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're not convinced this actually happened? When I was in elementary school, I regularly (ie. several times per semester) got into arguments with my math and science teachers over stuff this dumb. There's no need to make up something like this when you can find it in the real world so easily.

In grade school I had an argument with my science teacher about wheels. She said that a point along the outside of a wheel moved faster than a point nearer to the center (which is absolutely correct). However, she followed that up by saying that the outside of the wheel makes more revolutions than the inside. I tried to correct her, but she wasn't having any of it. So I grabbed my bike from outside, brought it into t…

If anything, the inside should have to make more revolutions. Since the whole bike is traveling at 10 MPH, at the point with the smaller radius, you'd need more revolutions to travel that same linear speed.

;-)

Post reply on HN