Earlier quoted context omitted.
Although it is a good sign, it's not that cool. The operating overhead of a charity should be largely irrelevant to working out if it is a good charity. For example, given charities X and Y both distributing anti-malaria pills (or something). X and Y are identical except X has operating overheads of 80%, and distributes 50 pills per dollar donated and Y has no operating overhead, but only manage 20 pills per dollar d…
Why can Y distribute fewer pills if they have no overhead?
Re: Meet Watsi, Y Combinator's First Nonprofit
#171Don't know, this is purely a thought experiment and, in fact, it doesn't matter: for whatever reason, Y distributes few pills.