Live data from Hacker News

'Pervert glasses': Backlash against Meta's smart glasses grows

seattletimes.com

171–180 of 280 posts

Re: 'Pervert glasses': Backlash against Meta's smart glasses grows

#171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wouldn't wear them when I'm walking in the woods or hanging out at home. Having 'incoming car warning', or waypoint nav when I'm biking/running? That would be great!

I personally prefer good old situational awareness

As long as it's achieved in the manner that you approve of, of course.

Re: 'Pervert glasses': Backlash against Meta's smart glasses grows

#172
The demonizing of devices like this as "pervert glasses" incredibly fucking juvenile and obnoxious. We're going to throw out an entire concept because a handful of scumbags abuses them. This isn't serious discussion, this is just mobs of imbeciles running around with pitchforks.

Re: 'Pervert glasses': Backlash against Meta's smart glasses grows

#173
post #149

What comes to mind are those orange tip laws mandating that airsoft guns must be manufactured with an orange tip to differentiate them visually from real firearms. In this case, maybe there could be some mandated standardized high-viz indicator that there is a camera lens being pointed at you in wearable devices. I could see maybe allowing the high-viz element to be concealed if the mechanism concealing it also block…

I think mandating that all cameras have both flashing warning light and audible alarm would be good standard. Surely AI is now easily capable of eliminating those from the record so wouldn't be big deal.

Re: 'Pervert glasses': Backlash against Meta's smart glasses grows

#174

Tech is so frustrating in real life. I feel like we have all the cool sci fi stuff I always wanted, but everything comes with a monkey's paw style gotcha. The idea of meta glasses is so awesome, I want a heads up display to show me whatever I want. But there is no way in hell I would use them because the company that makes it can’t be trusted.

It’s so interesting to me that there are still so many people who see the monkey’s-paw thing as somehow secondary or incidental, even those who acknowledge that it’s often there! I don’t really understand why this is, or why I feel differently. To me at least, the monkey’s-paw aspect is primary now, to the point that the gee-whiz aspect hardly bears on my thinking at all. I’m not telling you that I think you’re wrong…

It's still "be careful what you wish for."

We got tech and only then realized all the things that we then lost.

Re: 'Pervert glasses': Backlash against Meta's smart glasses grows

#175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bro, read the article. As much as I hate corporations, this is not there fault. It's women who don't like perverts using the glasses and the perverts who use these glasses to look at women. This is a phenomenon among the masses of consumers who use this tech, the corporation has nothing to do with it. In fact the corporation is trying to reign in your freedom to use these tools by stopping this perverted stuff from h…

If someone threatens to kill you and you wiretap it as evidence... that evidence is dismissible in court even after said subject (you) was found dead. That's not how the law works in the U.S. or most of Europe. A recording of the defendant threatening to kill the victim is admissible as evidence, especially if the victim winds up dead shortly thereafter. For example, see https://www.thebulldog.law/california-penal-co…

Maybe they make exceptions for murder, but in general, wiretapped evidence is dismissible.

Re: 'Pervert glasses': Backlash against Meta's smart glasses grows

#176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Its a bit strange of a default assumption to me. What is _your_ default assumption re: use case? I honestly can't think of any use cases (outside of very niche a11y uses) that are not in some way offensive, though perhaps not 'perverted'. This product is absolutely toxic, and I can't imagine myself or anyone I know being willing to associate or socialize with someone wearing them (again, excluding some very specifi…

i love watching all the youtube shorts and instagrams of ppl helping or doing good deeds most of them use meta glasses it seems to record the pov

Some people might consider that falling into the "creepy" use case.

Re: 'Pervert glasses': Backlash against Meta's smart glasses grows

#177
post #18

I was trying to brainstorm ways to make these palatable to general society. Because I think this kind of thing is going to happen, but a lot of people (myself included) have a legitimate problem with surreptitious recordings. It needs a "recording" light when it is recording. But creeps will just disable the recording light with e.g. a sticker. Idea: What if the recording light embeds a little IR signal, and if the c…

It is something that must be treated as crime. And punished actually harshly say 1 year mandatory minimum for first offence, 5 for second and then life in prison for third strike. No parole.

Re: 'Pervert glasses': Backlash against Meta's smart glasses grows

#179

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bro, read the article. As much as I hate corporations, this is not there fault. It's women who don't like perverts using the glasses and the perverts who use these glasses to look at women. This is a phenomenon among the masses of consumers who use this tech, the corporation has nothing to do with it. In fact the corporation is trying to reign in your freedom to use these tools by stopping this perverted stuff from h…

freedom of speech != freedom to surreptitiously record

It does to me. What if someone threatens to bomb the statue of liberty. You have the freedom to say that, but the cost is people have the freedom to listen and record.

The freedom to record affectively tempers freedom of speech and stops people from using the former freedom excessively.

Re: 'Pervert glasses': Backlash against Meta's smart glasses grows

#180
post #17

Tech is so frustrating in real life. I feel like we have all the cool sci fi stuff I always wanted, but everything comes with a monkey's paw style gotcha. The idea of meta glasses is so awesome, I want a heads up display to show me whatever I want. But there is no way in hell I would use them because the company that makes it can’t be trusted.

After covid I forgot the names of coworkers, I'm really bad at remembering them. Having something that could just show me peoples names would be nice. Maybe I'm just a bad person for not remembering them and it could be a nice challenge to my existing social behaviors to ask again. I wouldn't trust meta enough to use these glasses, I dont even use instragram.

I use a list in the Reminders app on iOS just for keeping track of people's names. Each reminder is titled after the name of a business, and its notes contain a list of people I've met along with brief descriptions of them and important events going on in their life.

Each reminder is geofenced to the business it's attached to. Thus, when I get within the vicinity of any of the businesses in that list, it shows me the reminder. Kind of like a Rolodex. It doubles as a flash card of sorts when I don't patron the business that day.

I don't depend on it as much these days as this simply existing helped me get better at name recall, but it was immensely helpful when I created it.

Post reply on HN