Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is not like that. This is literally they saying they are letting their LLM run wild(ish) and seeing the status.claude.com we can see the result. This is a case where the outcome is the direct result of the engineering practices like the ones they describe. PS: Yes I use Claude, Coded, Amp and Cursor agents every day so I am not saying here LLMs are not valuable. LE: They did not made claims that "AI is good" the…
Another data point: GitHub is extremely insistent its employees maximally use AI for internal development [0], and we’ve concomitantly seen its reliability fall off a cliff in the last year or so. [0] https://github.com/resources/insights/ai-powered-workforce-p...
Or it could be that GitHub saw a 14x increase in commit volume last year[0], and we've concomitantly seen its reliability fall of a cliff in the last year or so. Given that Microsoft is leasing additional space on AWS(!)[1] to handle the additional commit volume, my personal money is on commit volume growth being a bigger issue than internal use of AI.
Internal use of AI may have been an issue. Commit volume growth may have been an issue. Unless one has direct knowledge of their infrastructure issues, claiming to know is quite literally making exactly the "they are vegan, their illness must be caused by their veganism" argument the GP commenter was talking about.
[0]https://daringfireball.net/linked/2026/05/04/commits-on-gith...
[1]https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-github-amazon-ai-c...