Live data from Hacker News

Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

itsfoss.com

171–180 of 276 posts

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#171
post #19

If this means that they release a iOS version with the same Adblock features as brave then I’m sold. I use essentially all OSs and I want a browser with basic features like adblocking/custom filters on all the platforms and currently Firefox fails this on iOS devices. Still I believe the Firefox sync is much more robust than eg. Brave one , among various platforms. But then I will also need Firefox to fix keyboard sh…

Doesn't iOS restrict all browsers to using WebKit?

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't this blog post more evidence that drewdevault became an extreme leftist? I mean he's basically going off a checklist of leftist stereotypes here and trying to check as many of them as possible. Meanwhile the other guy he's criticising is literally just a standard right-wing conservative, not far right, not alt right, just the regular kind. The far right I've seen is basically beyond the idea of being merely ant…

Sorry, but painting these people as "standard right-wing" is just evidence for the shifting of the Overton window further to the right. White replacement theory and expressing support for an alt-right ideologue who manipulated people with bad faith, dishonest and downright monstrous arguments is not "standard right-wing". Charlie Kirk was for mass deportation . He didn't even hide it. He said it openly. How do you co…

Well, the overtone window certainly changed, but ... I judge a bit different here.

"expressing support for an alt-right ideologue"

This is what Kling actually said:

"RIP Charlie Kirk

I hope many more debate nerds carry on his quest to engage young people with words, not fists."

I also support fighting with words, not fists. I do not support his ideology at all and would have loved to debate him openly, but the concept of murdering someone for having the wrong opinion is disturbing to me, so I agree with Kling here.

And about "white replacement"

"'White males are actively discriminated against in tech.

It’s an open secret of Silicon Valley.'

One of the last meetings I attended before leaving Apple (in 2017) was management asking us to “keep the corporate diversity targets in mind” when interviewing potential new hires.

The phrasing was careful, but the implication was pretty clear.

I knew in my heart this wasn’t wholesome, but I was too scared to rock the boat at the time."

He said whites were discriminated for being white. Not replaced. That is not really the same to me.

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#173
post #149
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This will ensure certain types of add-ons, like ad-blockers, continue to work best in Firefox. Oof, so even people that should really know better are now equating MV3 with "no more ad blocking"? I think at this point the entire thing just needs to be renamed. (Only Chrome removed the request blocking API from their MV3 implementation; Firefox did not.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Chrome#Manifest_V3_2 > However, DeclarativeWebRequest is limited in the number of rules that may be set, and the types of expressions that may be used.[336] Additionally, the prohibition of remotely-hosted code will restrict the ability for filter lists to be updated independently of the extension itself. As the Chrome Web Store review process has an invariable length, filter list…

It is, but it’s not relevant. Firefox offers both APIs.

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#174
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What exactly is your gripe with MV3? Many people seem to treat it synonymously with "no more procedural request blocking", but that's not a thing Mozilla ever did: > For Manifest V3 extensions, Chrome no longer supports the "webRequestBlocking" permission (except for policy-installed extensions). Instead, the "webRequest" and "webRequestAuthProvider" permissions enable you to supply credentials asynchronously. Firefo…

> What exactly is your gripe with MV3? Running an adblocker is the defining feature of the extensions API. ublock origin has 5x as many users as the second-most-popular extension [1] Supporting ublock isn't just a nice-to-have add-on feature for an extension API, it's literally the only thing most users care about. [1] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/search/?promoted=re...

Reading comprehension is the defining feature of a good commenter.

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> Good luck with the main developer being in the alt right. Sources? I can't find anything on that via google/ddg (Germany) edit: oof. [1] https://drewdevault.com/blog/Cloudflare-and-fascists/

[flagged]

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#176
post #171
post #19

If this means that they release a iOS version with the same Adblock features as brave then I’m sold. I use essentially all OSs and I want a browser with basic features like adblocking/custom filters on all the platforms and currently Firefox fails this on iOS devices. Still I believe the Firefox sync is much more robust than eg. Brave one , among various platforms. But then I will also need Firefox to fix keyboard sh…

Doesn't iOS restrict all browsers to using WebKit?

Yep, but your typical Apple user is happy to blame everybody but themselves and Apple.

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#177

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If he showed up in the Epstein files I'd stop using Brave. Until then, I'll keep on rolling my eyes whenever someone brings up this stuff from... 2008.

Indeed. I wonder if the folks rejecting Brave have also vetted the political beliefs of everyone that delivers their packages, manufactured their phone, and grown their food. The injection of politics into absolutely everything is so arbitrary and harmful.

Why should they have to vet everyone? If I learn that the people who deliver my packages, manufacture my phones, or grow my food support practices that I deem fundamentally harmful to society, I change my behavior accordingly. Where does this weird idea come from that I have to vet literally everyone for my rejection of Brave to be valid?

> The injection of politics into absolutely everything is so arbitrary and harmful.

Are you referring to Eich, or the people who react to his political choices?

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#178
post #44
post #19

If this means that they release a iOS version with the same Adblock features as brave then I’m sold. I use essentially all OSs and I want a browser with basic features like adblocking/custom filters on all the platforms and currently Firefox fails this on iOS devices. Still I believe the Firefox sync is much more robust than eg. Brave one , among various platforms. But then I will also need Firefox to fix keyboard sh…

What is the use case for keyboard shortcuts on handheld devices? On desktops/laptops, keyboard shortcuts save reaching for a mouse, aiming (on the relativley large screen), and clicking. On handhelds, I don't think it's faster to use a shortcut than to simply tap something an inch away. Also, on handhelds, the keyboard blocks a significant part of the screen. And keyboard shortcuts typically use accelerator keys, whi…

>What is the use case for keyboard shortcuts on handheld devices?

As someone who bought an HTC Dream / Android G1 when it was new, and wishes more handhelds had a similar form factor, this comment depresses me.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#179
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know if Edge supports MV2, but they do have uBlock available and it works just as well as on Firefox.

It may look like it works "just as well" but that's not true. There are numerous things that impact performance and effectiveness that are not possible with chromium-based browsers, or at least have to be done inefficiently, including * pre-fetching * html filtering * use of WebAssembly * data compression and private/incognito mode

Edge has its own extension API in addition to the Chromium one, it's possible that they've managed to mitigate or eliminate these problems.

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#180
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What exactly is your gripe with MV3? Many people seem to treat it synonymously with "no more procedural request blocking", but that's not a thing Mozilla ever did: > For Manifest V3 extensions, Chrome no longer supports the "webRequestBlocking" permission (except for policy-installed extensions). Instead, the "webRequest" and "webRequestAuthProvider" permissions enable you to supply credentials asynchronously. Firefo…

> What exactly is your gripe with MV3? Running an adblocker is the defining feature of the extensions API. ublock origin has 5x as many users as the second-most-popular extension [1] Supporting ublock isn't just a nice-to-have add-on feature for an extension API, it's literally the only thing most users care about. [1] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/search/?promoted=re...

Firefox's MV3 implementation doesn't remove the original netRequest API though IIRC.
Post reply on HN