Earlier quoted context omitted.
What the hell is AI token farming?
I think they mean serving inference workloads
Bitcoin miners are losing on every coin produced as difficulty drops
171–180 of 238 posts
Re: Bitcoin miners are losing on every coin produced as difficulty drops
#172The headline is dramatic but this is literally how bitcoin is designed to work. Miners leave, difficulty drops, costs go down, mining becomes profitable again. The interesting part isn’t the loss per coin, it’s how long the lag between unprofitable mining and difficulty adjustment keeps forced selling pressure on the market.
Re: Bitcoin miners are losing on every coin produced as difficulty drops
#173Re: Bitcoin miners are losing on every coin produced as difficulty drops
#174Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a soft failure-mode for bitcoin where due to the alternating difficulty adjustment, you could end up with people only mining every other 2016-block adjustment. Let's call this cycle A and cycle B. If A is too hard, miners drop out, cycle B gets easier, miners flood back, cycle A gets harder. This results in the hard cycle getting longer and the easy cycle getting shorter. This isn't completely critical as the…
I thought the rate of mining was tied to the maximum transaction rate the network can support?
Your mining rate is simply your hash rate vs the hash difficulty.
Conceptually, it's analoglous to rolling random numbers in (0,1) until you get to a number smaller than 1/X, where X is large.
How long it takes you to do that, isn't dependent on how many other people are also trying to do that, if you get 1 hit per hour, then lots of other people getting hits doesn't actually stop you getting your 1 hit per hour.
Now, that's not quite the whole truth, as there's a small amount of time needed for propagation of the previous chain, but with an average hit globally of ~10 minutes, that's not actually a big factor.
What could happen to incentivise people is increased fees if blocks get less common due to dropped miners, there'd be more competition to get into blocks if they start filling up.
That combined with the fixed costs such as depreciation as othes mentioned, keeps the risk of this form of failure to a minimum.
Re: Bitcoin miners are losing on every coin produced as difficulty drops
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is a breakthrough on a more productive Po(useful)W: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47430951
Isn't the whole point of PoW that the work done is otherwise useless? I mean: you invest money (in form of your hardware/electricity bill) to mine a block, and that ensures that whoever would like to fork the chain has to spend at least as much money to do it. If PoW can earn you extra money outside of the Bitcoin ecosystem (by making the work "useful") it lowers the cost of the 51% attack, potentially making it prof…
Now, it doesn't necessarily lower the cost of an attack because you can adjust the required output to a cost that is suitable.
Re: Bitcoin miners are losing on every coin produced as difficulty drops
#176Re: Bitcoin miners are losing on every coin produced as difficulty drops
#177Re: Bitcoin miners are losing on every coin produced as difficulty drops
#178Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except people wanting to do more than 15 transactions a minute. Or that to scale everyone would need to store a petabyte size blockchain.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning_Network I have been paying for my VPN with lightning payments; it takes less than one second to go through.
Re: Bitcoin miners are losing on every coin produced as difficulty drops
#179Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except people wanting to do more than 15 transactions a minute. Or that to scale everyone would need to store a petabyte size blockchain.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning_Network I have been paying for my VPN with lightning payments; it takes less than one second to go through.
Re: Bitcoin miners are losing on every coin produced as difficulty drops
#180Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except for the inevitable and obvious fact that proof-of-work creates a self-sustaining primary incentive for energy waste more pernicious than has ever been seen in any other financial or commercial enterprise, obliterating any hope of having energy that is too cheap to meter.
Isn't this kind of the opposite? Mining Bitcoin requires both hardware and electricity, and the cheapest electricity is solar. There isn't any severe scarcity of the raw materials to make solar panels, or of sunlight, so Bitcoin miners can buy as many solar panels as they want and it would only increase the economies of scale for producing them for other purposes too. Solar has inconsistent output. There is none at n…
One thing we do not lack is demand for more energy.