171–180 of 236 posts
- AI generated article - Overconfident claims (which are based on solo dev) - Spending an absurd amount on an LLM subscription - No actual details, just buzzwords and generic claims If AI-hype was a person
Did we just stop caring about the art of programming altogether?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's doesn't work...yet. I agree my stomach churns a little at this sentence. However, paying customers care about reliability and performance. Code review helps that today, but it's only a matter of time before it is more performative than useful in serving those goals at the cost of velocity.
the (multi) billon dollar question is when that will happen, I think, case in point: the OP is a kid in his 20s describing the history of the last 3 years or so of small scale AI Development ( https://www.linkedin.com/in/silen-naihin/details/experience/ ) How does that compare to those of us with 15-50 years of software engineering experience working on giant codebases that have years of domain rules, customers and u…
- AI generated article - Overconfident claims (which are based on solo dev) - Spending an absurd amount on an LLM subscription - No actual details, just buzzwords and generic claims If AI-hype was a person
Also, what do you mean "you do not need to review the code". Why did you even start coding in the first place if this is a positive thing? Did we just stop caring about the art of programming altogether?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's things like this "super impactful!!!" style it has: > Enter Claude Code 2.0. > The UX had evolved. The harness is more flexible and robust. Bugs are fixed. But that's all secondary. It's OK for emphasis on some things, but when you see it on every blog, it's a bit much. Plus, I dislike that everything is lists with LLMs, it's another thing that you just start seeing everywhere.
That section doesn't include a lick of AI writing. One tell (maybe?) is that I switch from past tense to present tense mid sentence. Either a) I sound like an LLM when I'm writing articles (possible) or b) turing test AGI something something. Lists point is fair, I did use Claude for formatting. Where did it off put you here?
I guess I don't really mind the use of an LLM or not, it's more the style that sounds very samey with everything else. Whether it's an LLM or not is not very relevant, I guess.
I'm really trying to understand this. From a learner point of view this is useless because you aren't learning anything. From an entrepreneur point of view it's useless too, I suppose? I wouldn't ship something I'm not 100% sure about how it works.
- AI generated article - Overconfident claims (which are based on solo dev) - Spending an absurd amount on an LLM subscription - No actual details, just buzzwords and generic claims If AI-hype was a person
Also, what do you mean "you do not need to review the code". Why did you even start coding in the first place if this is a positive thing? Did we just stop caring about the art of programming altogether?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also, what do you mean "you do not need to review the code". Why did you even start coding in the first place if this is a positive thing? Did we just stop caring about the art of programming altogether?
Surprisingly, for some people, the goal is the goal, and they don't care much about the journey.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's already reality if you want to, today and in 10-20 years the outcome will be the same: being an homeless! And no please no UBI bs thanks
99.9% of today’s jobs will be fully automated in 20 years. What do you think will happen to all the unemployed population?