Fathers’ choices may be packaged and passed down in sperm RNA

Post by [deleted] » Sun, Dec 28, 2025, 8:22 PM UTC

timbit42 wrote: post #157

blitz_skull wrote: post #146

I always find it fascinating when science catches up to the Bible. The Bible clearly articulates some form of generational “pass-through” for the sins of the father passing to the children. While I do think it largely refers to a spiritual judgement, it’s hard to ignore the real-world examples of abuse that always seem to repeat themselves without a huge effort on the part of, someone, usually the child after they’ve…

Where does the Bible say that the sins of the father are passed to the children? Ezekiel 18 says exactly the opposite. Romans 5 doesn't say we inherit Adam's sin but that we inherit the consequences of Adam's sin. Exodus 20:5 says the iniquity of the fathers pass down for three or four generations. This is not referring to the sin itself, but to the effects of the sin of the children who grow up watching their parent…

Post by DANmode » Sun, Dec 28, 2025, 8:35 PM UTC

whimsicalism wrote: post #172

DANmode wrote: post #165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Off-topic completely now, but for your information, one last question: does your opinion cover patents who have blood test results showing Lyme, and one or more known coinfections like Bab, Bart, (all known, and treatable bacterial infections), or are you another Reddit regurgitation expert?

i think this isn’t going to be a productive conversation regardless of what i say. take care

Post by bflesch » Sun, Dec 28, 2025, 8:56 PM UTC

EPWN3D wrote: post #17

websiteapi wrote: post #9

assuming this is true, perhaps it's best to freeze sperm regularly with labels that way if you go off the deep end you can snapshot quite literally your best self? some possible times - right before college, right after college, after you meet someone you think you'd marry (but before you do), after marriage. seems like a neat premise for a sci fi novella.

That'd be a great basis for a controlled experiment.

Post by DANmode » Sun, Dec 28, 2025, 9:40 PM UTC

somenameforme wrote: post #169

DANmode wrote: post #147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> nicotine is significantly more harmful than caffeine “ Significantly ” is an opinion. It’s more toxic by weight, yes. Messes with vascular more than caffeine. Both are an excellent way to screw up heart health. > let’s not get started on the CFS stuff, treatments for functional disorders are often placebo-resembling. Personally haven’t needed or wanted to use nicotine, but I have recovered from an array of chronic…

> Both are an excellent way to screw up heart health. Plain black coffee has, somewhat surprisingly, been repeatedly demonstrated to be very healthy - with substantial reductions in all-cause mortality as well as the chances of developing cardiovascular disease. I tend to live somewhat spartanly in terms of consumption, and wanted to drop my coffee habit which looks something like this [1], but looking up the data on…

Post by kjkjadksj » Sun, Dec 28, 2025, 10:17 PM UTC

SoftTalker wrote: post #26

websiteapi wrote: post #9

assuming this is true, perhaps it's best to freeze sperm regularly with labels that way if you go off the deep end you can snapshot quite literally your best self? some possible times - right before college, right after college, after you meet someone you think you'd marry (but before you do), after marriage. seems like a neat premise for a sci fi novella.

I think trying to "tune" your kids in any way is asking to be disappointed. My three kids could not be more different and they all have the same mother, grew up in the same house, etc. If "microRNA" profiles have any influence, I would wager it's very small.