171–180 of 186 posts
So Nvidia stock is going to crash hard when the Chinese inevitably produce their own competitive chip. Though I’m baffled by the fact they don’t just license and pump out billions of AMD chips. Nvidia is ahead, but not that far ahead. My consumer AMD card (7900 XTX) outperforms the 15x more expensive Nvidia server chip (L40S) that I was using.
no way this delay's about gpus lol. deepseek prob has r2 cooked already. r1‑0528 already pumped expectations too high. if r2 lands flat ppl start doubting. or who knows maybe they just chillin watching how west labs burn gpu money, let eval metas shift. then drop r2 when oai/claude trust graph dips a bit
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Rumour was that DeepSeek used the outputs of the thinking steps in OpenAI's reasoning model (o1 at the time) to traing DeepSeek's Large Reasoning Model R1.
Maybe they also do that, but I work with a class of problems* that no other model has managed to crack, except for R1 and that is still the case today. Remember that DeepSeek is the offshoot of a hedge fund that was already using machine learning extensively, so they probably have troves of high quality datasets and source code repos to throw at it. Plus, they might have higher quality data for the Chinese side of th…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Rumour was that DeepSeek used the outputs of the thinking steps in OpenAI's reasoning model (o1 at the time) to traing DeepSeek's Large Reasoning Model R1.
I don't think so. They came up with a new RL algorithm that's just better.
Be mindful of what this means. A kid in his garage fine tuning a model can "catch up" to SOTA models for most use cases. For actual "frontier" work that requires SOTA levels of intelligence, there are only 3 companies in the race. None of them are from China or Europe.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This, my guess is OpenAI wised up after r1 and put safeguards in place for o3 that it didn't have for o1, hence the delay.
I think that's unlikely. DeepSeek-R1 0528 performs almost as well as o3 in AI quality benchmarks. So, either OpenAI didn't restrict access, DeepSeek wasn't using OpenAI's output, or using OpenAI's output doesn't have a material impact in DeepSeek's performance. https://artificialanalysis.ai/?models=gpt-4-1%2Co4-mini%2Co3...
"Follow the money."
Businesses are pouring money into the OpenAI API. This is your biggest clue.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Odd. I’d think it’d be all the companies in the US ignoring IP and copyright laws.
Examples please.
https://www.bakerlaw.com/services/artificial-intelligence-ai...
Seems like it would be a definitive list to me as it shows US AI companies getting sued for copyright infringement.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Examples please.
This source provides on-going case numbers for court litigation: https://www.bakerlaw.com/services/artificial-intelligence-ai... Seems like it would be a definitive list to me as it shows US AI companies getting sued for copyright infringement.
And, isn't this the system working exactly how it is supposed to? Someone makes a claim and the courts decide, and then some kind of punishment will be doled out of the claim was found to be true?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, and Putin will definitely never invade Ukraine! Any suggestion to the contrary is just blatant American warmongering.
They are not the same situation. I won’t list all the reasons, but in broad strokes; Taiwan is a Pacific Ocean away from the warmongering USA (in American, btw, and a life long member of the war machine), Taiwan is not culturally inclined as Ukraine, Taiwan is not led by an alien group, China has time on their side, China has proximity on their side, China’s has dependency on its side, China has civilizational moment…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The phrasing for quoting sources is extremely codified, it means the journalists have verified who the sources are (either insider or people with access with insider information).
How does this matter? If the journalists aren’t fully trusted in the first place… trusting them to strictly adhere to even the best codified rules seems even less likely.
(A lot of things break down in society without trust, maybe that's already how the US is? Where I live it is thankfully still somewhat ok)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This source provides on-going case numbers for court litigation: https://www.bakerlaw.com/services/artificial-intelligence-ai... Seems like it would be a definitive list to me as it shows US AI companies getting sued for copyright infringement.
So you're capable of knowing what the judges will decide on these cases? You've already decided that they are liable for what they're accused of? And, isn't this the system working exactly how it is supposed to? Someone makes a claim and the courts decide, and then some kind of punishment will be doled out of the claim was found to be true?