Live data from Hacker News

Google is burying the web alive

nymag.com

171–180 of 208 posts

Re: Google is burying the web alive

#171
post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you have a zero sum game, any advice you give is creating an arms race. The only solution is to have fewer Berliners or more housing.

Or eliminate rent control, allowing prices to float to the level people are actually willing to pay. You only see bot-driven stuff like that in cases where desirable goods are being deliberately under-priced.

This will benefit the wealthier strata of society, but why does the city belong to them more than anyone else?

Re: Google is burying the web alive

#172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "Go out and talk to people" isn't valid advice. It's never been, but in 2025 finally even the mainstream is slowly admitting that this doesn't work. Why doesn't it work?

It absolutely does work but it’s too vague. A person in this position really needs to go outside and talk to people but doesn’t where to start. So, join a running club, or go to pub trivia, take an in person class, or volunteer. Pick literally anything you can show up once a week and there will be people doing stuff. It will change your life.

It's ridiculous that anno domini 2025 when someone says "I have issues making social connections" the default assumption is still that the person literally hasn't put any effort. It's literally the extension of "noooo there are no bigger social changes going on, the only reason why you can't get a date is because you don't shower, I'm absolutely sure of it, stop showing me statistics that loneliness is a growing problem across the whole society I will deny that and accuse of bad hygiene or being creepy, it's your personal failure, you need to understand this".

Re: Google is burying the web alive

#173
when you could just type a question into a chatbox and receive a well thought out, nuanced response instead of having to click into multiple ad-ridden, seo ""optimized"" websites just to find an answer isn't it obvious why one is winning over the other?

for many people, they just want an answer to their question. whatever means they get that answer doesn't really matter. the new trend of locking your website content behind a sign in wall or app download is only going push more people to chatbots.

Re: Google is burying the web alive

#174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "Go out and talk to people" isn't valid advice. It's never been, but in 2025 finally even the mainstream is slowly admitting that this doesn't work. Why doesn't it work?

a) people go out to spend time with already established friends, not talk to random strangers b) people don't want to be approached by random strangers c) I want to be friends with people who have similar lifestyle and values to me and create deeper connections d) people have busy schedules and don't have time to meet Source: I've tried > but you haven't tried this particular activity that I recommend so you cannot t…

> "Go out and talk to people" isn't valid advice. It's never been, but in 2025 finally even the mainstream is slowly admitting that this doesn't work.

It continues to work for me in 2025.

Re: Google is burying the web alive

#175
post #46

I can weigh in on this. I run a small information website ( https://allaboutberlin.com ). My traffic has been growing steadily for 7 years, but now its down 30-ish percent year on year. From what I'm hearing, my competitors (and friends) are having it worse. My main mission is to put new information on the internet. It's harder to do this if AI destroys the economics of it. It's also harder without an audience who pr…

its super helpful. supporting. you should also accept crypto!

Re: Google is burying the web alive

#176
post #46

I can weigh in on this. I run a small information website ( https://allaboutberlin.com ). My traffic has been growing steadily for 7 years, but now its down 30-ish percent year on year. From what I'm hearing, my competitors (and friends) are having it worse. My main mission is to put new information on the internet. It's harder to do this if AI destroys the economics of it. It's also harder without an audience who pr…

What I can gather from your comment is that the problem is capitalism, not AI.

Re: Google is burying the web alive

#177

Earlier quoted context omitted.

a) people go out to spend time with already established friends, not talk to random strangers b) people don't want to be approached by random strangers c) I want to be friends with people who have similar lifestyle and values to me and create deeper connections d) people have busy schedules and don't have time to meet Source: I've tried > but you haven't tried this particular activity that I recommend so you cannot t…

> "Go out and talk to people" isn't valid advice. It's never been, but in 2025 finally even the mainstream is slowly admitting that this doesn't work. It continues to work for me in 2025.

If you're short on money, try renting out one of your houses. Works for me.

Re: Google is burying the web alive

#178
post #171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or eliminate rent control, allowing prices to float to the level people are actually willing to pay. You only see bot-driven stuff like that in cases where desirable goods are being deliberately under-priced.

This will benefit the wealthier strata of society, but why does the city belong to them more than anyone else?

Why should it belong to people who are good at botting? That's a much less fair way to allocate resources than wealth. In a free society wealth is used to buy things, that's the point of earning it. If you don't generate more wealth and you trade it away then eventually you end up poor again. If you're generating wealth continuously, then the things you can buy with it are the reward for doing so. It's much better for everyone that desirable apartments go to people who earned them rather than those who randomly managed to shave some milliseconds off a TCP connection.

Re: Google is burying the web alive

#179
post #171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This will benefit the wealthier strata of society, but why does the city belong to them more than anyone else?

Why should it belong to people who are good at botting? That's a much less fair way to allocate resources than wealth. In a free society wealth is used to buy things, that's the point of earning it. If you don't generate more wealth and you trade it away then eventually you end up poor again. If you're generating wealth continuously, then the things you can buy with it are the reward for doing so. It's much better fo…

The wealthy can buy bots then.

Re: Google is burying the web alive

#180

This is actually a good thing, now we don’t have to sift though a dozen semiautomatically created SEO gaming website that try and make the same point 5-6 said in slightly different ways.

Search is one of the best ways for startups to compete against incumbents. AI will prioritize known / most popular brands. Want to start an alternative to QuickBooks? Using search you could get hundreds of thousands of people on your website. In the future? AI will recommend QuickBooks.
Post reply on HN