Earlier quoted context omitted.
Remember that checklist meme from /.? The “You seem to be advocating/here is why it will not work”? Well, you’ve burned a bit of time on HN with the karma you’ve accrued. The non-conspiratorial truth is that if you go back and read HN over a longer period of time, it amounts to people parroting other people’s unhinged takes. Least offensive is tech, which is merely juvenile. But the other topics, especially medical o…
We're being downvoted to oblivion, but notice nobody is saying we are wrong?
DOGE engineer's credentials found in past public leaks from info-stealer malware
171–180 of 180 posts
Re: DOGE engineer's credentials found in past public leaks from info-stealer malware
#172Earlier quoted context omitted.
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake. The democrats don't have the numbers - even if they did, the more ridiculous the whole thing gets the better for them it is.
Siting around and do nothing is going to come back and bite incumbent democrats in a couple years. Sure they might not lose the general election to a republican but their primary is going to be painful.
Re: DOGE engineer's credentials found in past public leaks from info-stealer malware
#173Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you actually believe that? Do you not think that at least SOME OF THEM, are working their asses off to save american tax payer dollars? Can you point to any of the contracts in the wall of savings that have saved billions of dollars and disagree with any of them? https://doge.gov/savings
You can't trust their claimed savings either. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/13/us/politics/doge-contract...
NYT is a trash media outlet, which obviously leans everything anti-elon.
Re: DOGE engineer's credentials found in past public leaks from info-stealer malware
#174Earlier quoted context omitted.
How bad can it be? Be pardoned by a SCOTUS immune president?
Ask Rudy Giuliani or any architect foolish enough to take a project from him. While Trump might know more about protecting people who help him than he did then, it would be out of character for him to expend the time it takes to sign something if his benefit in the transaction is over.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_United_States_Capito...
"...The extraordinary pardons and commutations extended to those who committed both violent and nonviolent crimes on Jan. 6, including assaulting police officers and seditious conspiracy..."
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/20/us/politics/trump-pardons...
Re: DOGE engineer's credentials found in past public leaks from info-stealer malware
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is the point good enough to elaborate further preferably with actual proof instead of just opinion?
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, then at some point you gotta assume it's a duck. No need to run a DNA test.
Re: DOGE engineer's credentials found in past public leaks from info-stealer malware
#176Buried down the text, they have the plausible deniability disclaimer:
"As Lee notes, the presence of an individual’s credentials in such logs isn’t automatically an indication that the individual himself was compromised or used a weak password. In many cases, such data is exposed through database compromises that hit the service provider. The steady stream of published credentials for Schutt, however, is a clear indication that the credentials he has used over a decade or more have been publicly known at various points."
Of course "credentials have been exposed": the vast majority of sites have been hacked. It doesn't mean this person used the same credentials everywhere, AND that they didn't use 2FA, AND that the credentials matter in the first place. And, of course, this has absolutely nothing to do with malware.
Shame on you ARS for publishing purely speculative posts.
Re: DOGE engineer's credentials found in past public leaks from info-stealer malware
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, then at some point you gotta assume it's a duck. No need to run a DNA test.
This perspective is ripe for being manipulated. Use critical thinking and learn to sit with uncertainty.
Re: DOGE engineer's credentials found in past public leaks from info-stealer malware
#178Earlier quoted context omitted.
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, then at some point you gotta assume it's a duck. No need to run a DNA test.
This perspective is ripe for being manipulated. Use critical thinking and learn to sit with uncertainty.
Maybe tell that to the guy in the white house. I'm tired of being held to much higher standards than that person. There are limits.
Re: DOGE engineer's credentials found in past public leaks from info-stealer malware
#179Earlier quoted context omitted.
You misspelled Reagan. (Though to be fair, every president since Truman has escalated things with Russia/USSR, except maybe Clinton. Reagan just did more than most.) > You don't think trump is actively involved in negotations[sic] with russia to stop all this madness? No, I think Trump is doing whatever Putin wants him to do.
No other president has given explicit permission to launch american missles and use american guidance systems to launch missles into russian territory... Besides biden. What are you talking about? And you forgot... besides Trump. because trumps not a warmonger, people like to act like he's on the side of the russians. People have lost their minds.
In the last 3 months, Trump has threatened to invade:
- Greenland - Canada - Mexico - Panama - Cuba
> people like to act like he's on the side of the russians
Trump has said that Ukraine is the one that started the war, and the "deal" he negotiated to end the war excluded Ukraine from the discussion and would give Russia everything it asked for.
> People have lost their minds.
You're right on that point, but its probably not the people you're thinking of.
Re: DOGE engineer's credentials found in past public leaks from info-stealer malware
#180Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I am not sure why we are falling for this click baity garbage, over and over. Because it's easier to create and broadcast bait than to filter it.
Until HN improves, I propose that we flag moronic titles (misleading, clickbait, just annoyingly moronic, and so on). In the long term HN should do something about it, e.g. editoralized titles.
HN does have a policy of using the original title from the submitted article, unless it is misleading or linkbait, and we try to be rigorous in enforcing it.
Users can help us by emailing us (hn@ycombinator.com) when they see a case where a title seems to be misleading or linkbait.