Live data from Hacker News

New York Times shut down Tor Onion service

open.nytimes.com

171–175 of 175 posts

Re: New York Times shut down Tor Onion service

#171
post #3

WhatsApp and Telegram are hardly replacements for Tor access. A government can block them easily. The onion service's days were numbered after they fired Runa Sandvik. I'm surprised it lasted this long. Looking at the pay and current labor disputes, it seems like the New York Times isn't a good place for a skilled software engineer to work these days. They'll keep running SecureDrop over an onion service, right...?

Yeah only last year a court in Spain ruled to block telegram for everyone after some minor civil law disagreement. I had to scramble to set up an MTProxy for me and my friends (which was pretty easy with docker). Fortunately it never happened because the government called them back.

Re: New York Times shut down Tor Onion service

#172

If my life or my freedom would be at stake, I wouldn't rely on TOR for anonymity.

In fact it's quite the opposite. If you need to do something to save your life and youre weighing the decision of take no action vs take action via tor; you and anyone else would take the risk with tor.

Re: New York Times shut down Tor Onion service

#174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or covering for Stalin and denying the famine in ukraine.

They really did that? I'm a bit surprised, for me the NYT is the definition of the atlantist newspaper, up to the absurd.

https://www.nytco.com/company/prizes-awards/new-york-times-s...

I forgot they even got a pulitzer for this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Duranty

Re: New York Times shut down Tor Onion service

#175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is why the standard is two (or more) independent sources.

You should count the actual number of sources in an article, it's virtually always singular.

Source needed. This smells of nonsense to confirm a bias.
Post reply on HN