Live data from Hacker News

Run DeepSeek R1 Dynamic 1.58-bit

unsloth.ai

171–180 of 346 posts

Re: Run DeepSeek R1 Dynamic 1.58-bit

#171
post #125
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can I use that on the train though? I can with a 128GB MacBook, without it sounding like a helicopter taking off as well.

> Can I use that on the train though? I can with a 128GB MacBook, without it sounding like a helicopter taking off as well. What kind of timescale do you expect to be able to train a useful LLM with that?

[deleted]

Re: Run DeepSeek R1 Dynamic 1.58-bit

#172
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> ran whatever version Ollama downloaded on a 3070ti (laptop version). It's reasonably fast. Probably was not r1, but one of the other models that got trained on r1, which apparently might still be quite good.

Ollama has been deliberately misrepresenting R1 distill models as "R1" for marketing purposes. A lot of "AI" influencers on social media are unabashedly doing the same. Ollama's default "R1" model is a 4-bit RTN quantized 7B model, which is nowhere close to the real R1 (a 671B parameter fp8 MoE). https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1i8ifxd/ollama_...

I mean... yes. The DeepSeek announcement puts R1 right there in the name for those models. https://api-docs.deepseek.com/news/news250120

It's fairly clear that R1-Llama or R1-Qwen is a distill, and they're all coming directly from DeepSeek.

As an aside, at least the larger distilled models (I'm mostly running r1-llama-distill-70b) are definitely not the same thing as the base llama/qwen models. I'm getting better results locally, admittedly with the slower inference time as it does the whole "" section.

Surprisingly - The content in the section is actually quite useful on its own. If you're using the model to spitball or brainstorm, getting to see it do that process is just flat out useful. Sometimes more-so than the actual answer it finally produces.

Re: Run DeepSeek R1 Dynamic 1.58-bit

#173

Random observation 1: I was running DeepSeek yesterday on my Linux with a RTX 4090 and I noticed that the models should fit into VRAM, which is 24GB. Or they are simply slow. So the Apple shared memory architecture has an advantage here. A 192GB Mx Ultra can load and process large models efficiently. Random observation 2: It's time to cancel the OpenAI subscription.

I disagree with cancelling the OpenAI subscription. I've been getting some help from o1 for both python and php recently, and o1 was doing massively better for the python stuff (it ran, deepseeks didn't and wont with prompt refinement).

IIRC thezvi's summary post on R1 mentioned that R1 is amazing for general reasoning and is very clearly a successful proof of concept/capability but a lot of effort seems to have been put into making o1 Good At Code as a practical matter, whereas R1 seems to have been more a research project which proved out the approaches and then was released without sanding the rough edges off because that wasn't the point.

Re: Run DeepSeek R1 Dynamic 1.58-bit

#174

An 80% size reduction is no joke, and the fact that the 1.58-bit version runs on dual H100s at 140 tokens/s is kind of mind-blowing. That said, I’m still skeptical about how practical this really is for most people. Like, yeah, you can run it on 24GB VRAM or even with just 20GB RAM, but "slow" is an understatement—those speeds would make even the most patient person throw their hands up. And then there’s the whole re…

>Like, I get that shared memory architectures like a 192GB Mac Ultra are a big deal, but who’s dropping $6,000+ on that setup? AMD strix halo APU will have quad channel memory and will launch soon so expect these kinds of setups available for much less. Apple is charging an arm and a leg for memory upgrades, hopefully we get competition soon. From what I saw at CES OEMs are paying attention to this use case as well -…

Unfortunately, Apple’s RAM and Storage upgrade prices are very in line with other class comparable OEMs.

I’m sure there’ll be some amount of undercutting but I don’t think it’ll be a huge difference on the RAM side itself.

Re: Run DeepSeek R1 Dynamic 1.58-bit

#175
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I canceled my OpenAI subscription last night, as did many many others. There were some threads in reddit with everyone chiming in they all just canceled too. imo OpenAI is done, and will go through massive cuts and probably acquired by the end of the year for a very tiny fraction of its current value.

Why every time there is a new model all the other competitors are declared immediately dead?

Because we like drama.

Re: Run DeepSeek R1 Dynamic 1.58-bit

#176
post #53

An 80% size reduction is no joke, and the fact that the 1.58-bit version runs on dual H100s at 140 tokens/s is kind of mind-blowing. That said, I’m still skeptical about how practical this really is for most people. Like, yeah, you can run it on 24GB VRAM or even with just 20GB RAM, but "slow" is an understatement—those speeds would make even the most patient person throw their hands up. And then there’s the whole re…

Not everyone needs the largest model. There are variations or R1 with fewer parameters that can easily run on consumer hardware. With 80% size reduction you could run 70B on 8-bit on an RTX 3090. Other than that, if you really need the big one you can get six 3090s and you're good to go. It's not cheap, but you're running a ChatGPT equivalent model from your basement. A year ago this was a wetdream for most enthusias…

Or if you want a large model but don’t need high performance, get a Mac with 128GB UMA.

Re: Run DeepSeek R1 Dynamic 1.58-bit

#177
post #39

Wow, an 80% reduction in size for DeepSeek-R1 is just amazing! It's fantastic to see such large models becoming more accessible to those of us who don't have access to top-tier hardware. This kind of optimization opens up so many possibilities for experimenting at home. I'm impressed by the 140 tokens per second speed with the 1.58-bit quantization running on dual H100s. That kind of performance makes the model pract…

Btw completely off topic, but your comment triggered the internal classification in my brain, and it looks like AI-generated.

Not accusing you anything. Could be that you happen to write in a way similar to LLMs. Could be that we are influenced by LLM writing styles and are writing more and more like LLMs. Could be that the difference between LLM generated content and human-generated content is getting smaller and harder to tell.

Re: Run DeepSeek R1 Dynamic 1.58-bit

#178
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I canceled my OpenAI subscription last night, as did many many others. There were some threads in reddit with everyone chiming in they all just canceled too. imo OpenAI is done, and will go through massive cuts and probably acquired by the end of the year for a very tiny fraction of its current value.

You want to bet? The panic around deepseek is getting completely disconnected from reality. Don’t get me wrong what DS did is great, but anyone thinking this reshape the fundamental trend of scaling laws and make compute irrelevant is dead wrong. I’m sure OpenAI doesn’t really enjoy the PR right now, but guess what OpenAI/Google/Meta/Anthropic can do if you give them a recipe for 11x more efficient training ? They ca…

Computing is not king, DeepSeek just demonstrated otherwise. And yes, OpenAI will have to reinvent itself to copy DS, but this means they'll have to throw away a lot of their investment in existing tech. They might recover but it is not a minor hiccup as you suggest.

Re: Run DeepSeek R1 Dynamic 1.58-bit

#180
post #125
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can I use that on the train though? I can with a 128GB MacBook, without it sounding like a helicopter taking off as well.

> Can I use that on the train though? I can with a 128GB MacBook, without it sounding like a helicopter taking off as well. What kind of timescale do you expect to be able to train a useful LLM with that?

Well it’s about an hour to commute on the train so I guess that long :3
Post reply on HN