Live data from Hacker News

The Ivy League and other elite private colleges are losing esteem

natesilver.net

171–180 of 186 posts

Re: The Ivy League and other elite private colleges are losing esteem

#171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Because the population was nearly 100% Arab. When? Jews started coming back to Israel in the 19th century. That land was occupied by empires since the Jews were outcasts. Everyone who came there was a vagrant following the Ottoman empire. That doesn't make their land "theirs" anymore than it is ours. > Israelis are not barred from entry. I know of only one individual Israeli who has been barred from entering the Co…

> When? For many hundreds of years, until the British Empire took over and began supporting Zionist colonization of Palestine. The British denied the native population, which was almost 100% Arab, the right to determine what would happen with the land they lived on. Instead, Britain promised Palestine to an outside group. > E.g. Shai Davidai. He's the only person who's been banned from campus, for the reasons I state…

The British and French and Europe generally denied the entire world self-determination in that time period: literally every state surrounding Israel is the product of Sykes-Picot, just as one instance. Horrible ethnic violence and subjugation has been in endemic in all of those states. Israeli Jewish people, who are themselves plurality MENA people (contrary to the popular narrative that they're all displaced Europeans), correctly notice that they're the only ones whose residency is invalidated by appeals to the British.

None of this is to say that Israel's treatment of Gaza is defensible; rather, just to point out that you don't have to pick at the history of the region to make your case, especially because doing so isn't going to help you make that case.

Re: The Ivy League and other elite private colleges are losing esteem

#172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Because the population was nearly 100% Arab. When? Jews started coming back to Israel in the 19th century. That land was occupied by empires since the Jews were outcasts. Everyone who came there was a vagrant following the Ottoman empire. That doesn't make their land "theirs" anymore than it is ours. > Israelis are not barred from entry. I know of only one individual Israeli who has been barred from entering the Co…

> When? For many hundreds of years, until the British Empire took over and began supporting Zionist colonization of Palestine. The British denied the native population, which was almost 100% Arab, the right to determine what would happen with the land they lived on. Instead, Britain promised Palestine to an outside group. > E.g. Shai Davidai. He's the only person who's been banned from campus, for the reasons I state…

> For many hundreds of years

Oldest Palestinian dynasties are from around 18th century. Notice that calling them Palestinian is a stretch since they rarely had a unified identity as a people.

Jews started coming back to Israel en-mass in the 19th century, well before the British arrived. They bought land and at its peek owned a significant amount of land privately.

> which was almost 100% Arab

This is very false. If it was true Israel would have lost its independence war in which not only the Palestinians but also the surrounding countries attacked. Furthermore, notice that those Arab countries didn't give the Palestinians a country despite holding the west bank and Gaza. Neither did the Muslim Ottoman empire.

> > E.g. Shai Davidai. > > He's the only person who's been banned from campus

Many were locked out. Many spoke of fear to come to classes. Half the people in the encampment in NY weren't even students there. Professional agitators from outside the campus were guiding the students on maximizing their impact.

E.g. https://nypost.com/2024/05/01/us-news/professional-protester...

Here's a professor talking about violence and intimidation towards Jews on campus: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/education/2988097/...

There are quite a lot of these testimonials but they don't appear as prominently in the US media as they do on Israeli media where people feel more comfortable to speak out. There's claims that "Students for Justice for Palestine" are really cover organizations for terrorists just like BDS. There's a lawsuit of Oct 7th victims aimed to unmask them.

> Yosef Hadad isn't a student. He's a professional pro-Israel campaigner who went to campus, started yelling in the faces of protesters, and then got shoved by one of them.

So that's OK? He's a Muslim who came to help break people out of their distorted reactionary mold and got attacked.

> On the other hand, there have been plenty of assaults on pro-Palestinian students.

See how that starts?

See why these things are useless. Everyone plays the victim here. Palestinians have been playing the victim for a century. It made some sense in the past. But hasn't made any sense since the 90's. Right now they need to grow up and settle. Hamas is keeping a redundant conflict going because it refuses to accept the right of Israel to exist. It's delusional and you're part of the reason it keeps going.

Re: The Ivy League and other elite private colleges are losing esteem

#173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> When? For many hundreds of years, until the British Empire took over and began supporting Zionist colonization of Palestine. The British denied the native population, which was almost 100% Arab, the right to determine what would happen with the land they lived on. Instead, Britain promised Palestine to an outside group. > E.g. Shai Davidai. He's the only person who's been banned from campus, for the reasons I state…

> For many hundreds of years Oldest Palestinian dynasties are from around 18th century. Notice that calling them Palestinian is a stretch since they rarely had a unified identity as a people. Jews started coming back to Israel en-mass in the 19th century, well before the British arrived. They bought land and at its peek owned a significant amount of land privately. > which was almost 100% Arab This is very false. If…

Many were locked out.

Who?

You've yet to provide examples of people barred from the campus for reasons other than specific, well-documented charges against them (in the case of Davidai, of stalking and harassing other students. And then he wasn't even barred from the campus per so, but simply from the West Lawn).

Re: The Ivy League and other elite private colleges are losing esteem

#174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> For many hundreds of years Oldest Palestinian dynasties are from around 18th century. Notice that calling them Palestinian is a stretch since they rarely had a unified identity as a people. Jews started coming back to Israel en-mass in the 19th century, well before the British arrived. They bought land and at its peek owned a significant amount of land privately. > which was almost 100% Arab This is very false. If…

Many were locked out. Who? You've yet to provide examples of people barred from the campus for reasons other than specific, well-documented charges against them (in the case of Davidai, of stalking and harassing other students. And then he wasn't even barred from the campus per so, but simply from the West Lawn).

Here are four lecturers talking about being barred (as well as many students): https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/yokra13903890

None of them are Davidai and all of them look very dangerous (sarcasm). I've read what Davidai wrote and the claims that he's harassing seem ridiculous. He's trying to fight harassment from people who literally support terrorism and are hurting both sides of the conflict.

NYU president Linda Mills said she received threats and even bomb threats: https://nyunews.com/news/2024/05/03/mills-email-paulson-cent...

But US press doesn't write many of these stories because it doesn't fit the narrative of the publishers.

Here's a Stanford student dressed as a Hamas terrorist just for the general picture: https://ynet-pic1.yit.co.il/cdn-cgi/image/f=auto,w=740,q=75/...

Re: The Ivy League and other elite private colleges are losing esteem

#175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Many were locked out. Who? You've yet to provide examples of people barred from the campus for reasons other than specific, well-documented charges against them (in the case of Davidai, of stalking and harassing other students. And then he wasn't even barred from the campus per so, but simply from the West Lawn).

Here are four lecturers talking about being barred (as well as many students): https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/yokra13903890 None of them are Davidai and all of them look very dangerous (sarcasm). I've read what Davidai wrote and the claims that he's harassing seem ridiculous. He's trying to fight harassment from people who literally support terrorism and are hurting both sides of the conflict. NYU president Lind…

Here are four lecturers talking about being barred

That's not what the article says. Of the 4 academics, 1 of them (Hoftman) spoke of being assaulted after approaching the protests (just as protesters have been assaulted by folks from the pro-Israel side). Not of being "barred from entry" into the campus per your description:

But also look at Israelis who want to enter the universities and can't.

So far you are unable to substantiate this claim.

But US press doesn't write many of these stories because it doesn't fit the narrative of the publishers.

Of course it does - the Hoftman story was all over Fox News for example. It's viewers love to gobble up stories like these.

Re: The Ivy League and other elite private colleges are losing esteem

#176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here are four lecturers talking about being barred (as well as many students): https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/yokra13903890 None of them are Davidai and all of them look very dangerous (sarcasm). I've read what Davidai wrote and the claims that he's harassing seem ridiculous. He's trying to fight harassment from people who literally support terrorism and are hurting both sides of the conflict. NYU president Lind…

Here are four lecturers talking about being barred That's not what the article says. Of the 4 academics, 1 of them (Hoftman) spoke of being assaulted after approaching the protests (just as protesters have been assaulted by folks from the pro-Israel side). Not of being "barred from entry" into the campus per your description: But also look at Israelis who want to enter the universities and can't. So far you are unabl…

It's pretty interesting that you choose to ignore all the other supporting evidence of aggression I provided and focus only on a narrow claim. I have confirmation bias since I obviously have a side. A side that doesn't want his children stuck in a redundant war loop like we have been.

Furthermore, you choose to accept unsubstantiated claims against Davidai as fact because it supports your confirmation bias.

You want more here: https://edition.cnn.com/business/live-news/university-protes...

> “Jewish students…get a second-class education where they are relegated to their homes to attend classes virtually and stripped of the opportunity to interact meaningfully with other students and faculty and sit for examinations with their peers,” the lawsuit said. “The segregation of Jewish students is a dangerous development that can quickly escalate into more severe acts of violence and discrimination.”

and:

> The lawsuit alleges that a subset of protesters has committed acts of violence, harassed Jewish students and faculty and incited hate speech and acts of violence.

There's plenty of that online.

Finally, about your point of two sides. That's absolute nonsense. One side started the demonstrations and mass agitation, the reacting side can't be blamed. This is pretty typical of this entire situation, Israel gets attacked then blamed for response, results and its defense.

Own it. People were violent and racist. Outside forces came in and manipulated students most of which are ridiculously ignorant about the situation. They were manipulated, in much of the same way as Trump voters are manipulated, to believe blatant lies.

Re: The Ivy League and other elite private colleges are losing esteem

#177

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here are four lecturers talking about being barred That's not what the article says. Of the 4 academics, 1 of them (Hoftman) spoke of being assaulted after approaching the protests (just as protesters have been assaulted by folks from the pro-Israel side). Not of being "barred from entry" into the campus per your description: But also look at Israelis who want to enter the universities and can't. So far you are unabl…

It's pretty interesting that you choose to ignore all the other supporting evidence of aggression I provided and focus only on a narrow claim. I have confirmation bias since I obviously have a side. A side that doesn't want his children stuck in a redundant war loop like we have been. Furthermore, you choose to accept unsubstantiated claims against Davidai as fact because it supports your confirmation bias. You want…

> Jewish students…get a second-class education where they are relegated to their homes

Jews are taking part in the pro-Palestinian protests in large numbers. The idea that Jewish students are treated as second-class citizens at Columbia, in New York City, is simply absurd.

Re: The Ivy League and other elite private colleges are losing esteem

#178

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> When? For many hundreds of years, until the British Empire took over and began supporting Zionist colonization of Palestine. The British denied the native population, which was almost 100% Arab, the right to determine what would happen with the land they lived on. Instead, Britain promised Palestine to an outside group. > E.g. Shai Davidai. He's the only person who's been banned from campus, for the reasons I state…

The British and French and Europe generally denied the entire world self-determination in that time period: literally every state surrounding Israel is the product of Sykes-Picot, just as one instance. Horrible ethnic violence and subjugation has been in endemic in all of those states. Israeli Jewish people, who are themselves plurality MENA people (contrary to the popular narrative that they're all displaced Europea…

I don't know of any other case in modern times in which the British or French promised a country to people who didn't even live there.

British colonial administrators themselves quickly came to realize the insanity of what they were doing. The Balfour Declaration was basically a declaration of war against the population they were ruling over in Palestine, a population whose interests they were nominally supposed to rule in. Lord Curzon, who was the only British cabinet minister with expertise in the Middle East, warned about this before the Balfour Declaration was issued.

> Israeli Jewish people, who are themselves plurality MENA people (contrary to the popular narrative that they're all displaced Europeans)

Israel was founded pretty much solely by European Jews. Arab Jews emigrated to Israel years after it was founded, because the expulsion of the Palestinians and the Arab-Israeli conflict unleashed a wave of antisemitism across the Arab world.

Re: The Ivy League and other elite private colleges are losing esteem

#179

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> When? For many hundreds of years, until the British Empire took over and began supporting Zionist colonization of Palestine. The British denied the native population, which was almost 100% Arab, the right to determine what would happen with the land they lived on. Instead, Britain promised Palestine to an outside group. > E.g. Shai Davidai. He's the only person who's been banned from campus, for the reasons I state…

> For many hundreds of years Oldest Palestinian dynasties are from around 18th century. Notice that calling them Palestinian is a stretch since they rarely had a unified identity as a people. Jews started coming back to Israel en-mass in the 19th century, well before the British arrived. They bought land and at its peek owned a significant amount of land privately. > which was almost 100% Arab This is very false. If…

> Oldest Palestinian dynasties are from around 18th century.

Most of the ancestors of the Palestinians have lived in the region for as long as anyone can trace. The average Palestinian Arab is much more closely related to ancient Levantine people than the average Israeli Jew. Not that this should matter: what matters is that the foundation of the state of Israel required the mass expulsion of the native population, which was nearly 100% Arab.

> Jews started coming back to Israel en-mass in the 19th century, well before the British arrived.

There were small numbers of Jewish colonists who arrived in the late 19th Century, but they were still only a single-digit percentage of the population when the British took over.

>> which was almost 100% Arab

> This is very false. If it was true Israel would have lost its independence war

When the state of Israel was founded in 1948, the vast majority of its Jewish population had recently immigrated to Palestine. Just a few decades earlier, when the Zionist movement was founded, the native population of Palestine was nearly 100% Arab.

> violence and intimidation towards Jews on campus

This whole narrative about antisemitism on American campuses is completely fabricated. A fairly large share of the pro-Palestinian protesters are Jewish. They may even be the single largest ethnic group represented among the protesters. Columbia is a liberal campus in the middle of New York City, the city with the largest Jewish community in the world. The idea that Columbia is a den of antisemitism is particularly absurd.

Re: The Ivy League and other elite private colleges are losing esteem

#180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> For many hundreds of years Oldest Palestinian dynasties are from around 18th century. Notice that calling them Palestinian is a stretch since they rarely had a unified identity as a people. Jews started coming back to Israel en-mass in the 19th century, well before the British arrived. They bought land and at its peek owned a significant amount of land privately. > which was almost 100% Arab This is very false. If…

> Oldest Palestinian dynasties are from around 18th century. Most of the ancestors of the Palestinians have lived in the region for as long as anyone can trace. The average Palestinian Arab is much more closely related to ancient Levantine people than the average Israeli Jew. Not that this should matter: what matters is that the foundation of the state of Israel required the mass expulsion of the native population, w…

> Jews are taking part in the pro-Palestinian protests in large numbers.

That is the equivalent of the "I have a black friend so I can't be racist" argument. Quite a few Jews are ignorant of the situation and falsely blame Israel. To be fair, there's justified blame to lay on Israel about many things in the current situation. But the current demonstrations are definitely stupid and aren't helping.

> what matters is that the foundation of the state of Israel required the mass expulsion of the native population

Agreed. And now they want to perform a mass exodus of the Jews who live here.

> Israel required the mass expulsion of the native population,

That's a lie. There was some violence in 1947/8 before the state was properly formed and some militias were more violent than others due to lack of proper government. Blaming Israel for that is ridiculous. Israel was attacked violently in large numbers against the decision of the UN. Violence went both ways and a massive amount of Jews died in that war.

There was a massive exodus from Arab lands. Before 1947 there were Jews living all over Arab countries in large numbers. We were chased away from our homes. Can we have them back?

My fathers family ran from Morocco. I'm sure the Huties of Yemen won't welcome my spouse if she wants to go back to her paternal land. Her maternal land of Romania slaughtered most of her relatives as happened to my ancestral maternal relatives in Europe.

That's how history works. Sh*t happens. We got over it. Palestinians could have had a country multiple times in history and repeatedly chose to sabotage the process by refusing to settle with Israel. That is 100% self sabotage.

> There were small numbers of Jewish colonists who arrived in the late 19th Century, but they were still only a single-digit percentage of the population when the British took over.

Let's put numbers there: https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jewish-and-non-jewish-p...

Keep in mind that Jews had mobility issues both in Europe and in the Ottoman empire. They were barred from coming to Israel even if they wanted to and they tried.

The country during these years was practically empty by today's standards. 660,000 people in total. Today without including the occupied territories we have over 9M people 2.6M of them are not Jews.

Calling the number of Jews small and calling the country Arab is pretty disingenuous since the total number of people in Palestine was tiny. Even then the 600k number wasn't entirely Arab. There are many other minorities with roots in this country.

> When the state of Israel was founded in 1948, the vast majority of its Jewish population had recently immigrated to Palestine.

I wonder what happened that made so many Jews run away in search of somewhere to live... On the eve of WWII there were 449,000 Jews in Israel which is a significant number.

> when the Zionist movement was founded, the native population of Palestine was nearly 100% Arab.

Nope. The first Zionist congress was in 1869: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Zionist_Congress

Population was close to 8% and on a growing trend.

Other than placing redundant, mostly incorrect facts. What's your point?

Your point is that the Palestinians are victims. Well... Welcome to the club, we're the bloody club presidents. In 1992 I went on a trip with Palestinian youth to Europe as part of a teen peace delegation. The goal was to show the "adults" that even kids can make peace. During most of that trip we had a lot of grandstanding from both sides. The Palestinians played a lot of the victim card which was redundant. They understood us once we took a trip to a concentration camp together. They understood that victim-hood is pointless and brings nothing.

I wish more Palestinians would learn Jewish history. They are deeply misinformed about us.

Maybe that would trigger an understanding that the only path forward is acceptance of the current situation and negotiation.

> This whole narrative about antisemitism on American campuses is completely fabricated

You might think that. But even here I get people repeating tropes like "Jews controlling all the money". Antisemitism has always been around and is being cynically exploited by some people.

The demonstrations on campus are comprised mostly of people who have very little understanding of the actual situation. They are refined by external forces many of which are no part of academia.

> A fairly large share of the pro-Palestinian protesters are Jewish.

That is no longer true. This was true initially but most left. Think about the demands of the demonstration: blacklisting Israel. It's an academic embargo on Israel which is already taking place to some degree. Israeli academia members are finding it harder to go to conference and share research. It's harder to get grants and take part in research. This is also about investments which is probably nothing financially, but a symbolic "anti-Israel".

Jews are not anti-Israel. Most of us are liberal and this includes Israel which is one of the most liberal countries anywhere. We have one of the most progressive human rights laws, progressive gay rights and labor laws that would make San Francisco blush. But you don't understand the other side. You're thinking of them with the same sensibilities. This isn't the case. You can't think of people who crash airplanes filled with families into buildings with the same thought process we have here.

> Columbia is a liberal campus in the middle of New York City, the city with the largest Jewish community in the world. The idea that Columbia is a den of antisemitism is particularly absurd.

There's a common trope of the self hating Jew. It is a trope but it has some point, we're the first to blame ourselves, even here. The problem is that they think the antisemitism is caused by Israeli action, but it's bolstered by them as they are confirming a false narrative about Israel.

I'm sure you would accept that Trump has bolstered a lot of racism towards black people and Mexicans. Yet a lot of them support him. Does that make the first statement false?

If you can accept the last paragraph but can't accept the previous one, that's your confirmation bias ringing loudly...

Post reply on HN