Live data from Hacker News

Intel Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator

intel.com

171–180 of 260 posts

Re: Intel Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator

#172

One nice thing about this (and the new offerings from AMD) is that they will be using the "open accelerator module (OAM)" interface- which standardizes the connector that they use to put them on baseboards, similar to the SXM connections of Nvidia that use MegArray connectors to thier baseboards. With Nvidia, the SXM connection pinouts have always been held proprietary and confidential. For example, P100's and V100's…

The SXM2 interface is actually publicly documented! There is an open compute spec for a 8-way baseboard. You can find the pinouts there.

Upon further review... I think any actual base board schematics / pinouts touching the Nvidia hardware directly is indeed kept behind some sort of NDA or OEM license agreement and is specifically kept out of any of those documents for the Open Compute project JBOG rigs.

I think this is literally the impetus for their OAM spec which makes the pinout open and shareable. Up until that, they had to keep the actual designs of the baseboards out of the public due to that part being still controlled Nvidia IP.

Re: Intel Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator

#173

This appears to be manufactured by TSMC (or Samsung). The press release says it will use a 5nm process, which is not on Intel's roadmap. "The Intel Gaudi 3 accelerator, architected for efficient large-scale AI compute, is manufactured on a 5 nanometer (nm) process"

Habana was an acquisition and their use of TSMC predates the acquisition.

Re: Intel Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator

#174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This is one of the secret recipes of Intel Any other examples of this? I remember the secret sauce being a process advantage over the competition, exactly the opposite of making old tech outperform the state of the art.

Intels surprisingly fast 14nm processors come to mind. Born of necessity as they couldn't get their 10 and later 7nm processes working for years. Despite that Intel managed to keep up in single core performance with newer 7nm AMD chips, although at a mich higher power draw.

For like half of 14nm intel era, there was no competition on CPU market in any segment for them. Intel was able to improve their 14nm process and be better at branch prediction. Moving things to hardware implementation is what kept improving.

This isn't the same as getting more out of the same over and over again.

Re: Intel Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator

#175
post #16
post #7

> Twenty-four 200 gigabit (Gb) Ethernet ports are integrated into every Intel Gaudi 3 accelerator WHAT‽ It's basically got the equivalent of a 24-port, 200-gigabit switch built into it. How does that make sense? Can you imaging stringing 24 Cat 8 cables between servers in a single rack? Wait: How do you even decide where those cables go? Do you buy 24 Gaudi 3 accelerators and run cables directly between every single…

Infiniband I've heard as incredibly annoying to deal with procuring as well as some other aspects of it, so lots of folks very happy to get RoCE (ethernet) working instead, even if it is a bit cumbersome.

"RoCE"? Woah, I had to Google that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RDMA_over_Converged_Ethernet

    > RDMA over Converged Ethernet (RoCE) or InfiniBand over Ethernet (IBoE)[1] is a network protocol which allows remote direct memory access (RDMA) over an Ethernet network. It does this by encapsulating an InfiniBand (IB) transport packet over Ethernet.
Sounds very cool.

Re: Intel Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator

#176

> Twenty-four 200 gigabit (Gb) Ethernet ports are integrated into every Intel Gaudi 3 accelerator How much does a single 200Gbit active (or inactive) fiber cable cost? Probably thousands of dollars.. making even the cabling for each card Very Expensive. Nevermind the network switches themselves.. Simultaneously impressive and disappointing.

What do you mean by active vs inactive fiber cable? I tried to Google about this distinction, but I couldn't find anything helpful.

Re: Intel Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator

#177
post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why don't they sell used P100 DGX/HGX servers as a unit? Are those bare P100s only so cheap precisely because they're useless?

I have a theory some big cloud provider moved a ton of racks from SXM2 P100's to SXM2 V100's (those were a thing) and thus orphaned an absolute ton of P100's without their baseboards. Or, these salvage operations just stripped racks and kept the small stuff and e-waste the racks because they think it's the more efficient use of their storage space and would be easier to sell, without thinking correctly.

A ton of Nvidia GPUs fry their memory over time and need to be scrapped. Lookup nvidia (A100/H100) row remapping failure

Re: Intel Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator

#179
post #37
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does it not work for them? Where can I learn why?

Just go have a look around Github issues in their ROCm repositories on Github. A few months back the top excuse re: AMD was that we're not supposed to use their "consumer" cards, however the datacenter stuff is kosher. Well, guess what, we have purchased their datacenter card, MI50, and it's similarly screwed. Too many bugs in the kernel, kernel crashes, hangs, and the ROCm code is buggy / incomplete. When it works,…

Yeah, I think AMD will really struggle with the cloud providers.

Even Nvidia GPU's are tricky to sandbox, and it sounds like the AMD cards are really easy for the tenant to break (or at least force a restart of the underlying host).

AWS does have a Gaudi instance which is interesting, but overall I don't see why Azure, AWS & Google would deploy AMD or Intel GPU's at scale vs their own chips.

They need some competitor to Nvidia to help negotiate, but if its going to be a painful software support story suited to only a few enterprise customers, why not do it with your own chip?

Post reply on HN