Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I'm not sure "you and a swarm of a thousand digital clones" counts as fair use It obviously does not. You’re a commercial client.
> You’re a commercial client No, I'm broke and have no income. But about a year ago I wrote some 20 line Python programs that use GPT (feed it text from web searches) and was surprised to find they worked significantly better than Bing's AI search... I used it at a small scale with Python's (unofficial?) DuckDuckGo API, but I was looking for a way to scale up (ideally for free or very cheap). At the time, Bing's API…
Kagi and Wolfram
171–180 of 346 posts
Re: Kagi and Wolfram
#172So.... this is about a pay-subscription search engine called 'Kagi' out of Palo Alto, founded 2018. Made me think and have to do some digging for the 'Kagi' out of Berkeley founded in the 90s where you could register your shareware purchases in the days before PayPal. Which seems to have been largely scrubbed from history outside of some WayBack snapshots. https://www.macrumors.com/2016/08/01/kagi-shuts-down/ https:/…
Re: Kagi and Wolfram
#173I’ve spent money on things because I had to, I’ve spent money because I wanted to. I have rarely spent money on something because the idea just sounded good and been so consistently pleased with what I received for my investment. It’s not free, but Kagi is a small investment for a vastly improved (and customizable) search experience.
Best $10 I spend every month.
Re: Kagi and Wolfram
#174So.... this is about a pay-subscription search engine called 'Kagi' out of Palo Alto, founded 2018. Made me think and have to do some digging for the 'Kagi' out of Berkeley founded in the 90s where you could register your shareware purchases in the days before PayPal. Which seems to have been largely scrubbed from history outside of some WayBack snapshots. https://www.macrumors.com/2016/08/01/kagi-shuts-down/ https:/…
The two are unrelated, but they do reference the shareware platform in their FAQ. https://help.kagi.com/kagi/faq/faq.html#are-you-affiliated-w...
Re: Kagi and Wolfram
#175I pay for Kagi’s duo plan, $14/month or $151.20/year [1], a discount which implies a 10% cost of capital. At that discount rate, a lifetime membership at $1,680 would be rational for Kagi ($600 individual). And at that price, I’d pay! Hell, do $3k flat (5% cost of capital; ~$1k individual) and throw in an annual in-person event and I’d call it a great deal. For Kagi, moreover, it would be permanent capital. (I would…
I don't think this would ultimately be healthy for Kagi. The continuing pressure to maintain the value of the subscription since people can cancel at anytime IMHO drives their success.
Re: Kagi and Wolfram
#176Re: Kagi and Wolfram
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mathematica is a commercial product: https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/pricing/
Who uses Mathematica, in this age of python/Julia etc? The Grad student world seems to be captured by Matlab
Re: Kagi and Wolfram
#178Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mathematica is a commercial product: https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/pricing/
Who uses Mathematica, in this age of python/Julia etc? The Grad student world seems to be captured by Matlab
Re: Kagi and Wolfram
#179Wolfram Alpha still has the same old bug: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=2016-04-04+to+2019-01-3... = 2 years 9 months 27 days https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=2019-01-31+to+2016-04-0... = 2 years 9 months 26 days The duration should be identical but is off by one day. One day a space mission will fail due to this bug. Reported several times, they never cared.