171–180 of 350 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gotta love such a high quality fix. When your upper high tech, state of the art algorithm learns racist patterns just blocklist the word and move on. Don't worry about why it learned such patterns in the first place.
Humans do look like gorillas. We're related. It's natural that an imperfect program that deals with images will will mistake the two. Humans, unfortunately, are offended if you imply they look like gorillas. What's a good fix? Human sensitivity is arbitrary, so the fix is going to tend to be arbitrary too.
I've never been involved with implementing large-scale moderation or content controls, but it seems pretty standard that underlying automated rules aren't generally public, and I've always assumed this is because there's a kind of necessary "security through obscurity" aspect to them. E.g., publish a word blocklist and people can easily find how to express problematic things using words that aren't on the list. Thing…
The whole premise of your argument doesn't make sense. I'm talking to a computer, nobody gets hurt.
It's like censoring what I write in my notes app vs. what I write on someone's Facebook wall. In one case, I expect no moderation, whereas in the other case, I get that there needs to be some checks.
Human's obsession with race is so weird, and now we're projecting that on AIs.
I've never been involved with implementing large-scale moderation or content controls, but it seems pretty standard that underlying automated rules aren't generally public, and I've always assumed this is because there's a kind of necessary "security through obscurity" aspect to them. E.g., publish a word blocklist and people can easily find how to express problematic things using words that aren't on the list. Thing…
https://youtu.be/THZM4D1Lndg?si=0QQuLlH7JebSa6w3&t=485
If it doesn't start 8 minutes in, go to the 8 minute mark. Then again I can see why some wouldn't want transparency.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It does the same if you ask for pictures of past popes, 1945 German soldiers, etc.
It'll also add extra fingers to human hands. Presumably that's not because of DEI guardrails about polydactyly, right? The current state of the art in AI gets things wrong regularly .
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Humans do look like gorillas. We're related. It's natural that an imperfect program that deals with images will will mistake the two. Humans, unfortunately, are offended if you imply they look like gorillas. What's a good fix? Human sensitivity is arbitrary, so the fix is going to tend to be arbitrary too.
You do understand that this has nothing to humans in general right? This isn't AI recognizing some evolutionary pattern and drawing comparisons to humans and primates -- it's racist content that specifically targets black people that is present in the training data.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there any evidence that this is a consequence of DEI rather than a deeper technical issue?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GG1eyKjXQAA1FxU?format=jpg&name=... https://cdn.sanity.io/images/cjtc1tnd/production/912b6b5aacc... https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GG1ThfsWUAAp-SO?format=jpg&name=... https://cdn.sanity.io/images/cjtc1tnd/production/e2810c02ff6... https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GG1MnepXwAAkPL6?format=jpg&name=... https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GG0BLVsbMAARZXr?format=jpg&name=...