Earlier quoted context omitted.
My apologies to both you and grandparent, I faux-pass'd on using such sloppy jargon in a thread of general interest. If I can be useful in decoding some of that and helping to keep this topic accessible to the broader community I'd be happy to answer any questions about what I meant. I've cited a few useful resources elsewhere in the thread and am always eager to talk shop on topics like this, so fire away if you hav…
surely this guy is a bot.
ChatGPT for Teams
171–180 of 453 posts
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#172Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have 20 years of software development experience, and I couldn’t understand anything you said. Is there a dictionary for this new lingo, or am I just too mid?
He speaks very unclearly, instead of saying GPT-4-turbo he says 4.5 preview. 4.5 is invention of his. Also mixtral medium - no idea of what he means by that. Not to mention a claim that mixtral is as good as gpt-4. It’s on the quality of gpt3.5 at best, which is still amazing for an open source model, but a year behind openai
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#173Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are referring to LLM models. It‘s not about how much software dev experience you have
I have heard of LLMs, and understand most everything posted on HN, except quantum computing stuff.
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#174Could a moderator change the "Teams" in the title to lowercase (as it is in the article)? Capitalizing Teams misleadingly implies it's regarding Microsoft's chat platform.
Ok, big noob question I never understood how to capitalize headlines correctly. Can someone eli5 ?:D
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#175I thought teams would be cheaper than individual.
Have you ever seen an enterprise plan cheaper than the individual plans (Which are often free)? Now normal software is priced to squeeze as much money as you can, enterprises can afford more, so are charged more. Individuals are highly price sensitive, so has to be very cheap. GenAI is quite different in that its not 0 marginal cost, the marginal costs are probably at least 50% of the price. So the price difference b…
WinRAR is 30 EUR per user when buying a single license, 9 EUR when buying 100 licenses.
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mistral Medium beats 4.5 on the censorship benchmark. It doesn't refuse to help with anything that could be vaguely non-PC or could potentially be used to hurt anyone in the wrong hands, including dangerously hot salsa recipes.
That's not a metric. That's a use case. Certainly, no one here is arguing that there are things openai refuses to allow, and given that the effectiveness of using GPT4 on them is literally zero , a sweet potato connected to a spring and keyboard will "beat" GPT-4, if that's your scoring metric. If you want a meaningful comparison you need tasks that both tools are capable of doing , and then see how effective they ar…
Both tools are generative systems that produce text in response to a prompt. If Mistral was mute on random topics for no other reason that its makers dislike talking about that, would you say it doesn't count?
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
My apologies to both you and grandparent, I faux-pass'd on using such sloppy jargon in a thread of general interest. If I can be useful in decoding some of that and helping to keep this topic accessible to the broader community I'd be happy to answer any questions about what I meant. I've cited a few useful resources elsewhere in the thread and am always eager to talk shop on topics like this, so fire away if you hav…
surely this guy is a bot.
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#178Could a moderator change the "Teams" in the title to lowercase (as it is in the article)? Capitalizing Teams misleadingly implies it's regarding Microsoft's chat platform.
Ok, big noob question I never understood how to capitalize headlines correctly. Can someone eli5 ?:D
On HN, copy/paste is usually a safe bet (with a few exceptions): https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
If you mean in general, Wikipedia sums it up pretty well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_case
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#179Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#180Earlier quoted context omitted.
My apologies to both you and grandparent, I faux-pass'd on using such sloppy jargon in a thread of general interest. If I can be useful in decoding some of that and helping to keep this topic accessible to the broader community I'd be happy to answer any questions about what I meant. I've cited a few useful resources elsewhere in the thread and am always eager to talk shop on topics like this, so fire away if you hav…
A paragraph by paragraph "dumbed down" translation of your original words would be pretty neat to have for starters. Both to understand what you mean but also to understand the lingo.
Karpathy has a a great YouTube series where he gets into the details from `numpy` on up, and George Hotz is live-coding the obliteration of PyTorch as the performance champion on the more implementation side as we speak.
Altman being kind of a dubious-seeming guy who pretty clearly doesn't regard the word "charity" the same way the dictionary does is more-or-less common knowledge, though not often mentioned by aspiring YC applicants for obvious reasons.
Mistral is a French AI company founded by former big hitters at e.g. DeepMind that brought the best of the best on 2023's public domain developments into one model in particular that shattered all expectations of both what was realistic with open-weights and what was possible without a Bond Villain posture. That model is "Mixtral", an 8-way mixture of experts model using a whole bag of tricks but key among them are:
- gated mixture of experts in attention models - sliding window attention / context - direct-preference optimization (probably the big one and probably the one OpenAI is struggling to keep up with, probably more institutionally than technically as probably a bunch of bigshots have a lot of skin in the InstructGPT/RLHF/PPO game)
It's common knowledge that GPT-4 and derivatives were mixture models but no one had done it blindingly well in an open way until recently.
SaaS companies doing "AI as a service" have a big wall in front of them called "60%+ of the TAM can't upload their data to random-ass cloud providers much less one run by a guy recently fired by his own board of directors", and for big chunks of finance (SOX, PCI, bunch of stuff), medical (HIPAA, others), defense (clearance, others), insurance, you get the idea: on-premise is the play for "AI stuff".
A scrappy group of hackers too numerous to enumerate but exemplified by `ggerganov` and collaborators, `TheBloke` and his backers, George Hotz and other TinyGrad contributors, and best exemplified in the "enough money to fuck with foundation models" sense by Mistral at the moment are pulling a Torvalds and making all of this free-as-in-I-can-download-and-run-it, and this gets very little airtime all things considered because roughly no one sees a low-effort path to monetizing it in the capital-E enterprise: that involves serious work and very low shady factors, which seems an awful lot like hard work to your bog-standard SaaS hustler and offers almost no mega data-mining opportunity to the somnobulent FAANG crowd. So it's kind of a fringe thing in spite of being clearly the future.