Live data from Hacker News

Chrome pushes forward with plans to limit ad blockers in the future

malwarebytes.com

171–180 of 250 posts

Re: Chrome pushes forward with plans to limit ad blockers in the future

#171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is truly unbelievable how bad it has become. Even informational articles might only have a paragraph of text between ads. Plus, the frequent animations/pop-unders/whatever. Everyone can decry the loss of the "small web" as much as they want, but the cram-ads-into-every-pixel dystopia means why should anyone bother? Even big brands are not immune to this behavior. At least if someone stays on the Instagram/Reddit/T…

> Even informational articles might only have a paragraph of text between ads. The thing that made me realize how bad it's gotten was ironically an inability to use ad blockers. At one job, we weren't allowed to install any adblockers to the browser (there was a lot of bureaucracy so I never figured out why). Ended up writing my own JS bookmarklets to remove ad elements from sites I commonly visited. Also started bro…

> At one job, we weren't allowed to install any adblockers to the browser (there was a lot of bureaucracy so I never figured out why).

It could have been the IT department fielding too many "this web-based app" isn't working requests due to ad-blockers. A lot of time can be spent trying to troubleshoot an issue before figuring out the cause is the ad-blocker.

Edit: It could also have been a policy to disincentivize people to use their work computer for non-work-related tasks. Ads typically don't pop up on work-related web applications.

Re: Chrome pushes forward with plans to limit ad blockers in the future

#172
post #137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m on Linux. Attempting to drag a tab to a new window doesn’t work and permanently breaks the “x” button to close tabs (until a restart).

Too bad your lies have been upvoted. I am also on Linux - had to boot it up just to make sure I am not spreading bs - and what do you know, dragging tabs between windows works just fine, like it always has.

I am happy you have a better experience, but it doesn’t do me any good.

Re: Chrome pushes forward with plans to limit ad blockers in the future

#173
post #67

I like Firefox a lot (with Privacy Badger and uBlock) but sometimes the browser slows to a crawl. New tabs are slow to open, takes way too long to select and activate a text input field, and so on. A restart fixes this, but it's still annoying. I think I might go back to Safari. I like the way it looks and it feels snappier all the way around.

Try installing the auto tab discard addon (It is a recommended addon so it gets checked by Firefox). I’ve noticed certain tabs may slow FF down if they aren’t unloaded in the background. I had FF slow to a crawl and when I checked it was using 7gb’s of ram. Turns out a site I had turned off uBO in had opened up a sub frame that was blasting ads. So it is interesting to try to see what is going on with about:processes…

Oh thank you! Didn't know this was a thing, super helpful.

Re: Chrome pushes forward with plans to limit ad blockers in the future

#174

> Nevertheless, Firefox said it will adopt Manifest V3 in the interest of cross-browser compatibility. The article makes it sound like Firefox will have the same ad blocker limitations as Chrome. The article fails to mention that Mozilla is implementing MV3 APIs in Firefox, but not removing the MV2 APIs like Chrome is: https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2022/05/18/manifest-v3-in-fi...

[deleted]

Re: Chrome pushes forward with plans to limit ad blockers in the future

#175
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Edge is following chromes lead. Vivaldi and Brave are going to maintain the code so at least uBlock Origin can work. Nobody knows how this will play out as the forks won’t want to stray faraway from the chromium code as that would add a lot of overhead. I tried a bunch of the forks, didn’t like Vivaldi, don’t like some of Braves crap, and won’t use the Chinese browser Opera. Ended up moving our family back to Firefox…

You should check https://github.com/filips123/PWAsForFirefox and Firefox Container Manager extension :)

Thanks! Looks interesting.

Re: Chrome pushes forward with plans to limit ad blockers in the future

#176
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Edge is following chromes lead. Vivaldi and Brave are going to maintain the code so at least uBlock Origin can work. Nobody knows how this will play out as the forks won’t want to stray faraway from the chromium code as that would add a lot of overhead. I tried a bunch of the forks, didn’t like Vivaldi, don’t like some of Braves crap, and won’t use the Chinese browser Opera. Ended up moving our family back to Firefox…

You should check https://github.com/filips123/PWAsForFirefox and Firefox Container Manager extension :)

Thanks, this is something I believe Mozilla made a bad decision to not implement.

Re: Chrome pushes forward with plans to limit ad blockers in the future

#177
post #138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I work on adblocking at Brave. 1. Brave, Vivaldi, and Opera have all announced they'd maintain support for Mv2 past Google's deprecation date [1]. 2. Your guess is correct - one of Google's stated motivations is to make the extension review process easier and less error-prone; having a way to opt-out would be counterproductive in that regard. I strongly doubt they'd accept the PR upstream; there is a chance other pla…

Will you be working together with Vivaldi and Opera to maintain the fork of MV2's request interception, or will we have multiple independent implementations?

Nothing coordinated so far, but keep in mind Mv2 code will still exist behind a policy flag in Chromium until at least June 2025; there's still quite some time.

Re: Chrome pushes forward with plans to limit ad blockers in the future

#178
post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Outlook.com isn't FAANG.

But it is GAFAM, which seems to be more relevant when you're looking at things from an overall size perspective. The focus on FAANG never made much sense to me.

[cynic speaks: ] Sometimes it seems that a catchy acronym lends an association a degree of tacit validity, and/or experiences an almost viral spread, simply by virtue of its easy uptake by the casual reader.

Re: Chrome pushes forward with plans to limit ad blockers in the future

#179
post #143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I don't see how one follows from the other. Attackers are using malicious extensions to eavesdrop on networks... therefore we need better reviews and not restricted APIs? I get why you might want to advocate for the latter over the former, but certainly it seems like restricting APIs also has positive impact. As I understand it, the APIs that are removed only remove the ability to modify network requests; the remai…

Ah, thank you. So the idea here is that extensions will still have the read access to requests, which is all attackers care about (typically). Confirmation would be interesting - at minimum I thought that inspecting requests (read only) Was being limited, but I'm just a casual observer.

I think this is the relevant API: https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/reference/webRe...

> As of Manifest V3, the "webRequestBlocking" permission is no longer available for most extensions. Consider "declarativeNetRequest", which enables use of the declarativeNetRequest API. Aside from "webRequestBlocking", the webRequest API will be unchanged and available for normal use.

So the other functionality, to inspect web requests, will still be available.

Re: Chrome pushes forward with plans to limit ad blockers in the future

#180
post #5

I like using Chrome and even went back to it after trying FF and Brave 2-3 years ago. But this would really make me look for alternatives, even if those are inferior. It's not even about Youtube. I pay for Youtube Premium. But not being able to block third party cookies would be a deal breaker.

If even tech people (who could easily have multiple browsers around) prefer Chrome over Firefox for minor problems out of convenience, I don't see how Firefox is supposed to really notably gain any market share even if Google completely locks out ad blockers.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN