Live data from Hacker News

Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time

nature.com

171–172 of 172 posts

Re: Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time

#171

When I was in grad school I had done measurements of the magnetic anisotropy of amorphous compounds. I had found an interesting link between the structure and the magnetic properties which is surprising since the material is amorphous, the material properties should be isotropic yet these had a preferred magnetization axis. During the discussions of these results with my advisor I was told in very clear terms that he…

I see this kind of stuff all the time and I'm convinced that Academia is corrupt. While working against a Grad Student doesn't seem particularly evil, rather just a bit backstabby/political, I suggest that it is 'really bad' because it contravenes the basic organizing principle of science itself.

Kind of like a Judge ruling one way or another for personal reasons, or ruling with a heavy conflict of interest.

There needs to be much stronger ethical principles around this and an advisor hinting at obfuscating work for such reasons should be up for review.

Re: Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time

#172

That timeline correlates well with the corporatization of academic research timeline, which got started in the late 1970s, boomed in the 1980s and has steadily risen ever since. The emphasis in applied science is now on patents and return-on-investment, aka safe bets. This is certainly the direction that much of NIH fundings, as well as DOE funding, has taken. Part of this is that entrenched industries (natural gas a…

Given that Tech Transfer offices don't make much money at all, and patents are mostly worthless, I doubtful of this theory. There simply is no 'return on investment' on most of the work.
Post reply on HN