Live data from Hacker News

Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conversation

blog.twitter.com

171–180 of 504 posts

Re: Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conversation

#171

Let's be honest – Musk doesn't know what the hell he is doing here.

It's a reminder that even some of our brightest minds are susceptible to the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

It continues to look as if Musk believes a Twitter turn-around is largely a technical project--rather than tending to a community of users.

Re: Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conversation

#172
post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Elon is pretty clearly unbanning violent right-wing extremists while banning rule-following accounts on the left, sometimes transparently at the direction of the right wingers. Why do you insist on pretending anything else?

Speaking of "pretending", that is false on both counts.

Twitter 2.0 is banning accounts as soon as Andy Ngo, the galaxy's biggest liar, demands they be banned.

https://theintercept.com/2022/11/29/elon-musk-twitter-andy-n...

Re: Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conversation

#173

First Twitter was going to crash in a week, then it was everyone would flee to Mastodon, now it’s that all the advertisers would leave. Maybe Twitter really didn’t need 7500 people, and maybe having more voices speak is a good thing (there is always block button), and maybe advertisers won’t flee forever. That seems more likely to me than Twitter imploding.

That was the talking point last week and the week before. You need to get up to speed with the latest outrage narrative. Don't worry about following up on any of it. There will always be a new one ready to go. Writing Elon articles is like the 'easy button' of mainstream media. It will always generate clicks which is a great way to advance your career as a professional 'content creator'. Just focus on this while the…

The character of this hysteria reminds me a lot of how the mainstream media obsessed over Trump in the 2015-2020 era.

Re: Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conversation

#175
I think he'll make it.

Not only does it look like Twitter will survive (if the mass-migration to another platform hasn't happened yet, when will it? If the site runs stable after the initial shock, why would it run less stable later?), it just might make Musk more powerful than we could ever imagine. Contrasting with other social media founders/owners he isn't shy to use the platform as a very personal thing, to actively shape the discussion and to pick and fight fights. The potential power he could potentially wield makes the purchase, as well as possibly running Twitter as a loss, worth it.

Re: Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conversation

#176

Let's be honest – Musk doesn't know what the hell he is doing here.

I'm starting to question how much he has ever. Has something changed with him? Or has he always been like this? If it's always been this rash, hasty and questionable then i can only imagine the real heroes are the people around him who managed to refine what he says and wants into tangible, achievable and coherent goals. Regardless of whether or not you agree with his actions these days, it does at least seem a signi…

[deleted]

Re: Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conversation

#177
post #8

> First, none of our policies have changed. Our approach to policy enforcement will rely more heavily on de-amplification of violative content: freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach. "Nothing has changed, except..." > Our Trust & Safety team continues its diligent work to keep the platform safe from hateful conduct, abusive behavior, and any violation of Twitter's rules. The team remains strong and well-resourc…

> Our Trust & Safety team continues its diligent work

IIRC, between direct firings and resignations they got rid of the entire team shortly after the takeover, including at least the first head installed after the takeover and firing of the former head, so the impression of continuity this seeks to invoke is at best misleading.

Re: Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conversation

#178
All the arrogant and uncited claims in posts like this... I would for once like to see some honesty.

How many of you were saying "It's a private company, it can do what it wants!!" when it was a public company, and now it does what it wants... "It must be destroyed!!".

Some of you have decent points... Others are insufferable arrogant assholes who know everything about everything. I would like someone to just please admit "I'm mad that Musk isn't using Twitter to suppress the people I don't like".

Re: Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conversation

#179
post #118

Let's be honest – Musk doesn't know what the hell he is doing here.

Just because you don't know what he's doing doesn't mean he doesn't know what he's doing. That's a common error in logic. You'll also have to ignore that he's built companies that land rockets back on Earth and produce millions of EVs. He's objectively demonstrated ability.

Another common error in logic is assuming that building rockets and building communities require the same kinds of skills.

Re: Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conversation

#180
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah... Also, the unbanning of users previously considered hateful also directly conflicts with "to keep the platform safe from hateful conduct"

Yea.. how does he expect this to be interpreted? Their stance hasn't changed.. cool, except before Twitter said some people posted hateful content, and banned them. Now they unbanned them, so what is the non-change? Does twitter agree that the comments were hateful, did that not change? If didn't change, then twitter agrees they were hateful comments and twitter is now happy to have them on the platform. Musk can't k…

Maybe their stance is that people shouldn't be banned forever?

I personally, don't believe in eternal bans. I always hate the horror stories where someone has made a mistake and thus Google bans them from all non-related activities for life, then bans the account of anyone who gave that person privileges too.

With respect to Twitter, I'd say sure Trump is an insurrectionist and a shameful individual, but it's been 2 years... while we can't all rightly forgive him, we can at least him speak his thoughts in 280 characters or less.

Post reply on HN