Twitter Blue for $8/Month
171–180 of 1001 posts
Re: Twitter Blue for $8/Month
#172Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t think you could have misread this interaction more than you already have.
I can see how you think that if you're not familiar with how blue checks are awarded and what they mean to the nobility class of Twitter.
I think you’re not familiar with a King as a person or an author based on your comment.
Finally, you thinking Musk was mocking is also wrong. He was using Kings viral tweet as a jump off point for the tweet this HN post is based off of.
Re: Twitter Blue for $8/Month
#173Re: Twitter Blue for $8/Month
#174The price 100% was $20/mo as previously reported by journalists until Twitter dunked on it, and Elon's interpretation of the backlash is "the price is too high" and not "any price makes no sense at all." This pricing clarification is most likely due to Stephen King's complaint: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1587312517679878144 > We need to pay the bills somehow! Twitter cannot rely entirely on advertisers. How…
"I was going to charge $20, but then Stephen King told me it was too much."
Re: Twitter Blue for $8/Month
#175The good: Twitter should not be editorally curating people through verification, making verification only about ID and being a real person is a broadly good change, as long as it's not necessary for participation. Brands, celebrities, those in the public eye could benefit from this. Needs to be implemented with care and ideally with a branding change so as not to confuse users as the semantics change. The bad: $8 is…
> $8 is way more than the profitability of an ad supported user. I don't think so. Twitter's ARPU from advertising in Q2 2022 was around $4.50. ARPU from advertising in the US was more than $14. Users likely to subscribe at $8/month (power users in western countries) are more valuable than average for advertising. No ads for $8/month would probably be a very bad idea.
Re: Twitter Blue for $8/Month
#176Maybe I'm missing something but wouldn't the paid-for check mark also mean that a given account can be more specifically targeted, thus increasing the potential ad revenue to Twitter?
Re: Twitter Blue for $8/Month
#177The price 100% was $20/mo as previously reported by journalists until Twitter dunked on it, and Elon's interpretation of the backlash is "the price is too high" and not "any price makes no sense at all." This pricing clarification is most likely due to Stephen King's complaint: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1587312517679878144 > We need to pay the bills somehow! Twitter cannot rely entirely on advertisers. How…
Imagine making pricing decisions for a 40 billion dollar business on a fucking whim based on feedback from a famous author. I guess this is in character, given that Musk likes to price things with meme numbers already.
Re: Twitter Blue for $8/Month
#178Would it have made any financial sense? Of course not. Would it have been the ultimate post-modern, trollish, liberating move imaginable? Absolutely.
Re: Twitter Blue for $8/Month
#179Bypass paywalls would be kind of a big deal imo. It could eventually shape how we use the internet and move away from ad based revenue.
It's been a feature for a long time. For some reason it was removed today and now Elon has "reintroduced" it as a new feature? https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/1/23434502/twitter-blue-ad-...
Re: Twitter Blue for $8/Month
#180Twitter is gonna crash and burn way sooner than I though.