Live data from Hacker News

Kitsault, Canada’s $50M 1980s ghost town

justinmcelroy.com

171–180 of 197 posts

Re: Kitsault, Canada’s $50M 1980s ghost town

#171
post #154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They did. The US’ Oregon Territory went well above the 49th parallel (current US/Canada border on the West coast), in fact all the way to where Alaska is today (southern most point on the coast). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_boundary_dispute

Well, they didn't, though. They certainly claimed it as did the British. However, when the dust settled, we got the border we have today.

Your argument is that we have the border we have today? I know!

Re: Kitsault, Canada’s $50M 1980s ghost town

#172
post #164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Looks like that chart doesn't contain information from the 80's. I found this chart where the 1980 price level and crash seems to be pretty significant: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Historical-rhenium-metal...

That's rhenium, not molybdenum?

AFAIK all metals collapsed in 1980 due to Silver Thursday

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_Thursday

Different metals are correlated too. There are charts at the end of

https://www.hwwi.org/fileadmin/hwwi/Publikationen/Research/P...

Re: Kitsault, Canada’s $50M 1980s ghost town

#174
post #169
post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A Hacker News town would be awful. A bloated mess of JavaScript powered "smart" things connected to a surveillance capitalism advertising dystopia.

Ooh. I am getting BioShock vibes.

Alexa, would you kindly turn on the kitchen lights?

Re: Kitsault, Canada’s $50M 1980s ghost town

#176
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let’s start a hacker news town!

Uhm, The infra looks super depressing... https://www.google.ca/maps/place/Kitsault,+BC+V0J+3T0,+Canad...

Maybe it's because I grew up in the '80s but other than the dated doctor's office, I didn't find those buildings to be depressing at all.

Re: Kitsault, Canada’s $50M 1980s ghost town

#177
post #120
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Due to spherical geometry, Prince Rupert is closer to Asia than any other reasonable North American port (sorry, Skagway) south of Anchorage. Kitsault is just up the inlet, and much easier to reach (crossing the Coast Mountains sunk Prince Rupert). It also happens to be easier (lower) to cross the Rockies (CA-16) when you're north of Prince George, so Kitsault could possibly have better access to Chicago than does, s…

There's rail access to Port Edward (just a couple miles from Prince Rupert) currently, going by what you can see in Google Maps. Looks like it follows a pretty flat route, though it winds around to follow the shorelines / rivers. I wonder how much sea level rise or flooding it would take to inundate that rail line and the Yellowhead highway? They seem like they're barely above water level now. Using Kisault as a port…

>There's rail access to Port Edward (just a couple miles from Prince Rupert) currently, going by what you can see in Google Maps. Looks like it follows a pretty flat route, though it winds around to follow the shorelines / rivers.

There is a railroad, but that is a windy, two-track railroad for the last ~200 kilometers from Kitwanga to Port Edward, with associated capacity limits and costs. To reach Kitsault from the relatively wide, flat Nisga'a Highway corridor, you need a tunnel of about 25 kilometers, but this could fit four or more tracks and run a much straighter, faster course. You can clearly see the difference:

https://i.postimg.cc/RhBLxfQx/railbc.jpg

Re: Kitsault, Canada’s $50M 1980s ghost town

#180
post #110
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Seems like a ferry would make sense to access it. BC already has a ton of those.

Ferry service is expensive infrastructure. Who would pay?

You're right that it's a chicken and egg problem. The place needs some resource to incentivize jumpstarting that infrastructure and it's not clear what that would be.
Post reply on HN