Live data from Hacker News

Average home prices in New Zealand reaches 8.8 times average household income

businessdesk.co.nz

171–172 of 172 posts

Re: Average home prices in New Zealand reaches 8.8 times average household income

#171
post #145
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think London throws them out of whack all that much. I'm around Milton Keynes/Bedford so SE but a bit further than most folk would want to commute to London (and I'd imagine a reasonable percentage of the population live within a similar radius of London) and that average house price feels about right. You'd might manage to get a three-bed terrace or two-bed semi for that sort of amount I'd say.

I dunno - I always assumed that London-proper prices (i.e., not Milton Keynes) being so outrageously high, upwards of £1,000,000, would throw out the average. Though perhaps the number of slightly cheaper apartments brings it back down again (although of course statistics can't tell you that's because the apartments are the size of a shoebox). Plus as I understand it, a bit further north you could probably start gett…

Do agree that it's hard to talk about averages - you almost need e.g. a heat map of the price for a certain size of 3-bed semi or 2-bed flat or such like. It's tricky too because house prices in areas of the country where there are few jobs are irrelevant for anybody needing a job who can't get one in that area. Although I imagine remote working has flattened things somewhat.

Re: Average home prices in New Zealand reaches 8.8 times average household income

#172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm Brisbane outskirts. Moved here to avoid the crazy Sydney prices about 5 years ago. We would expect a bit under double now, maybe 70% up. It's crazy. Great to feel you have more equity on the surface, but it's meaningless really as you have to sell to buy if your moving and then things like rates and stamp duty are higher than ever. I think the best solution is cap how many properties people can own. Homes are goo…

Unfortunately it's been the policy of successive Australian governments to put "real estate investment" into the engine room of the economy. They didn't do it 15 years ago vecahse they didn't want to. It's going to be an absolute ball-breaker trying to unwind the whole thing, too. If you limit it to 3 houses per person you'll get people buying houses for their three year olds (which already happens). It's an improvem…

> If you limit it to 3 houses per person you'll get people buying houses for their three year olds

That's easy enough to rule against, much like they do with income shifting to children.

> What we really need is 1960s Chinese Land Reforms

Not really into violence. Also where has it landed them 60 years later? The best is sensible structural rules for the long term.

Post reply on HN