https://outline.com/hGfBNu to read the full article without GDPR, paywall, or other annoyances.
Have we ever learned who is behind Outline?
Wall Street was the real winner of the GameStop saga
171–180 of 250 posts
Re: Wall Street was the real winner of the GameStop saga
#172Earlier quoted context omitted.
You don't need short selling for a stock's price to drop. Markets for everything else use the normal mechanism of "if no-one is going to buy this at this price, I need to drop my price if I want to sell it". For example: you can't go to the bakery, borrow a loaf of bread, sell it to a passing punter, and then pay the baker at 5pm when they drop the price to get rid of their stock before it goes stale. The rest of the…
You could absolutely do that bread trade (if you could convince a baker to lend you a loaf of bread), but then a smart baker wouldn't drop their prices at the end of day because they know a short seller needs to buy a bread to cover their position. The example is also wrong because stocks don't go off like bread does. For commodities that keep better like frozen orange juice or steel you can definitely borrow (for a…
If you sell empty bags on the street, promising the buyers there is bread inside, only to collect those empty bags back when the buyers throw the (supposed) bread away because it became worthless, is not good business. You're the only one profiting, both the bakers and the buyers are loosing money.
Re: Wall Street was the real winner of the GameStop saga
#173Because of my GameStop stock play, I am finally debt free for the first time in my life (after 35 years of paying). No car loan, no college loans, no mortgage. It actually felt good to pay over $10k in taxes for short term gains.
That’s a really interesting mix of questionable prudence with total responsibility. Obviously things didn’t work out so well for the people in the other side of your trades.
Re: Wall Street was the real winner of the GameStop saga
#174It was a weird, fun ride. My writing partner Lutz and I work in tech, but have a real passion for filmmaking. We lost some money on $GME, so we had to tell the story from our point of view. The result is STONKS, a comedy/drama feature screenplay [0], fictional but inspired by the GME events, and a love letter of sorts to WSB. We queried Hollywood producers but were ignored; we shared on WSB itself but we were insta-b…
Most discussion around $GME takes place on r/Superstonk these days anyways. Can't remember why it was banned from WSB. Something to do with the new mods I believe.
I was never clear if this was some sort of in-joke/meme, or some fringe idea that kept getting upvoted because it was hilarious, or if the people in there actually knew so little about stocks and economics that they thought something like that was possible.
Re: Wall Street was the real winner of the GameStop saga
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did something change about the company itself in the dips and bumps you just described buying and selling Gamestop at above?
Both Gamestop and Tesla were just the market freaking out. The market often does that. Much of the stock market is more about what other investors will do than what the companies themselves will do. It's a bunch of noise on top of the actual value of the companies themselves. Of course sometimes it is the companies themselves, and then you need to pay attention. And because you rarely know in advance whether a dip is…
Of course, the bigger picture challenge is that -- modulo market freakouts -- everyone else is also "checking if something changed about the company itself", and that's already built into the market price, that's kind of the model of how the market works. To make money by buying in dips only after checking if something is changed in the company itself, you have to think you are better at noticing or predicting changes in the company itself than everyone else, I guess?
Re: Wall Street was the real winner of the GameStop saga
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
You should check it out again. We recently restricted memes to Friday afternoon to Sunday morning and the context is almost all text now.
I can't figure out if this is sarcasm or an actual response.
Re: Wall Street was the real winner of the GameStop saga
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
You could absolutely do that bread trade (if you could convince a baker to lend you a loaf of bread), but then a smart baker wouldn't drop their prices at the end of day because they know a short seller needs to buy a bread to cover their position. The example is also wrong because stocks don't go off like bread does. For commodities that keep better like frozen orange juice or steel you can definitely borrow (for a…
But one of the GME points was (is?) that stock is sold without being borrowed first. Or being borrowed without permission and multiple times... If you sell empty bags on the street, promising the buyers there is bread inside, only to collect those empty bags back when the buyers throw the (supposed) bread away because it became worthless, is not good business. You're the only one profiting, both the bakers and the bu…
A short seller making a bet that a stock goes down by selling the stock is simply the same (but in reverse) as someone betting the stock will go up by buying a stock. The underlying business is not affected at all.
Re: Wall Street was the real winner of the GameStop saga
#178Re: Wall Street was the real winner of the GameStop saga
#179Earlier quoted context omitted.
Most discussion around $GME takes place on r/Superstonk these days anyways. Can't remember why it was banned from WSB. Something to do with the new mods I believe.
/r/superstonk used to show up in my feed on Reddit a lot, and it seemed like most of the highly-upvoted posts were elaborate explanations of how, any day now, there was going to be some sort of massive short squeeze that was going to cause $GME to hit a price of ten or twenty million dollars a share (at which point the outstanding shares of $GME would be worth more than everything else on earth combined), and everybo…
But I can assure you that the members are 100% serious.
Re: Wall Street was the real winner of the GameStop saga
#180Earlier quoted context omitted.
That’s a really interesting mix of questionable prudence with total responsibility. Obviously things didn’t work out so well for the people in the other side of your trades.
One can only hope that the counter-party was Melvin Capital.