Earlier quoted context omitted.
Absolutely. Keepass gives you only a file that you have to sync by yourself and when you have multiple device editing the same file... Well... On the other hand, Bitwarden lets you self-host a complete server that handles everything. If you want something less resources intensive you can take a look at Vaultwarden which is a re-implementation of the server in Rust instead of C#. The main advantage is that it uses MyS…
It is funny, because to me "only a file you have to sync (and backup)" sounds more like an advantage than setting up an entire server environment just so you can access your passwords.
Apart from that bitwarden is just wayyy easier, you simply tell the (official) app the URL to your vault and it's basically good to go. You don't have to worry about synchronization one bit. The app is also fairly nice and has all the features you need. Bitwarden also does the browser integration well, unlike keepass where it's a major pia.