Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is completely irresponsible and without excuse for any main network operator/owner to not be completely aware of what each and every cable does which is connected to a switch/network router. If the owner refuses to determine this, they are responsible if there is a nefarious device on the network until they do. Wireless makes this much more complicated so any responsible admin will ensure the wireless network is c…
This is a silly take. People and orgs have a million reasons why their cables might be unlabeled. Shame on you for binary thinking without considering real world confounding factors.
The curious case of the Raspberry Pi in the network closet (2019)
171–180 of 269 posts
Re: The curious case of the Raspberry Pi in the network closet (2019)
#172Re: The curious case of the Raspberry Pi in the network closet (2019)
#173Earlier quoted context omitted.
what if this guy is just a hell of an introvert who is more comfortable rigging something like this up than with interacting with this boss. If this kid was in his early 20s I'd probably slap his wrist and impress on him the dangers of screwing with the company network closet. If he is an adult he really ought to know better
just came here to say that while I understand the sentiment, people in their 20s can vote, and should be considered adults, not kids.
Re: The curious case of the Raspberry Pi in the network closet (2019)
#174>And what do we do, when we want to find out a location associated with a wifi name? We go to wigle.net, enter the SSID (=wifi name) and it tells us where on the world it is found. I've always enjoyed having unique/personal SSIDs, but had never seriously considered this consequence. I wonder what the worlds generic SSIDs are.
Re: The curious case of the Raspberry Pi in the network closet (2019)
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is completely irresponsible and without excuse for any main network operator/owner to not be completely aware of what each and every cable does which is connected to a switch/network router. If the owner refuses to determine this, they are responsible if there is a nefarious device on the network until they do. Wireless makes this much more complicated so any responsible admin will ensure the wireless network is c…
This is a silly take. People and orgs have a million reasons why their cables might be unlabeled. Shame on you for binary thinking without considering real world confounding factors.
If you’re hired because the old person didn’t follow basic maintenance procedures, you’re still ignorant until you rewire or trace the whole company’s network.
Re: The curious case of the Raspberry Pi in the network closet (2019)
#176That one really felt like a written-version of a Mr. Robot episode. Lovely!
Re: The curious case of the Raspberry Pi in the network closet (2019)
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
> An encrypted disk would be kind of useless in such a device as it would require the user to login every time the device reboots There is actually a solution for that (shameless plug): https://www.recompile.se/mandos
While I'm sure I could configure this on a system, the level of understanding required to actually create it honestly is fantastic. Is this something you created yourself, or was it a community project?
And at one company they were worried about the devices getting stolen, so they could had HSMs and still couldn’t reboot unattended (though most of the signing keys were with humans rather that automated)
Re: The curious case of the Raspberry Pi in the network closet (2019)
#178Gripping! Would love to read more articles in this “genre”. I’m wondering if there was an easy way for the attacker to encrypt or obfuscate some of these configuration files, so that defenders can’t extract settings even when physically connected to the device.
Read The Cuckoo's Egg by Cliff Stoll. An oldie but a goldie.
Re: The curious case of the Raspberry Pi in the network closet (2019)
#179Re: The curious case of the Raspberry Pi in the network closet (2019)
#180Earlier quoted context omitted.
“Gifted” individuals are selected at early ages to run through rigorous education programs that greatly push them ahead of their peers. It is a pipeline to create intellectual elites and captains of industry. Gifted kids are widely accepted as the most intelligent kids of a school and held up as the finest examples of the school’s educational abilities.
Do kids in gifted programs go on to become intellectual elites and “captains of industry” at higher rates than their peers?
It got me some interesting opportunities here and there but I am fundamentally kind of a slacker :)