Live data from Hacker News

Is Norway the New East India Company?

branko2f7.substack.com

171–172 of 172 posts

Re: Is Norway the New East India Company?

#171
post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Compare this situation to Nigeria Not really comparable. Nigeria is in this case more like China during the opium wars - the western companies are taking away their oil from them with bribery, political and economic threats. Just read a bit about how Shell operates there, they have more power than the government.

This seems to be the fault of the Nigerian government no? Shell is going to push its luck as far as it can with every country

People wrongly assume that colonisation effectively ended after the 2nd world wars.

The truth is it is difficult to wean away governments & companies used to milking the colonies dry to give up so easily. Not to mention the many institutions including religious & media designed to aid this exploitation.

As much as the blame might be place on Nigeria, it is not to be ignored that a lot of power and influence is still held by the English speaking elite who are inturn in the grips of the colonial institutions and their masters.

In my own country of India, any attempt to decolonise is labeled "right wing nationalist".

None of us were happy to wear a tie to school when the temperature goes upto 45 degrees, this colonial brainwashing has to go for the people to become really free.

Re: Is Norway the New East India Company?

#172
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, you are not alone in rightly assuming that the whole article is bullshit. The whole basis of the article is that East India company did not sell opium in the west, but sold it to the Chinese. And that "similarly" Norway advocates for clean energy but grows wealthy by selling oil and gas. The comparison is illogical because the East India company was the poster boy of imperialism and corporate exploitation. It had…

The Dutch East India company ( VOC) did plenty of conquering themselves in present day Indonesia and the Caribbean. And in a more indirect way ( funding rebels, lobbying their government to intervene), so did the United Fruit Company in Central America. India wasn't really a country, more akin to the various Italian or German ( if we exclude the whole HRE thing) states pre-unification than a country - a bunch of inde…

India is a geographical term. It is no more a united nation than the Equator --Churchill (b. 1874)
Post reply on HN