Live data from Hacker News

Covid-19 Was 'A Preventable Disaster,' WHO-Ordered Report Says

wbur.org

171–173 of 173 posts

Re: Covid-19 Was 'A Preventable Disaster,' WHO-Ordered Report Says

#171
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also WHO told people not to wear masks and that it could actually make it more likely to get covid (CDC echoed this as well). “But it was justified lying to protect the mask supply!”—some people already had masks, and didn’t wear them because of this. I had someone literally get mad at me and block me because I said wearing a mask was obviously a good idea, and an N95 is more likely to protect you than a cloth mask.

Ironically, WHO and CDC have done bad messaging on both sides of this. I get slammed every time I bring this up now, because the issue is politicized and, let's be honest, pretty traumatic as well. But I think it's important so I'll keep trying. Everyone should have been masking up as soon as possible in the pandemic. Case counts were low, we didn't know much about the route of transmission, and we also thought it wa…

I don't know if anyone is still reading this, but Wired just published a detailed smoking gun on the aerosols question.

https://www.wired.com/story/the-teeny-tiny-scientific-screwu...

It's really good, I learned a lot of new things. Please read this if you're at all interested in the subject: and who among us isn't at this point?

Re: Covid-19 Was 'A Preventable Disaster,' WHO-Ordered Report Says

#172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Have you considered that the "desperate clamor" might just be a clamor to do the best thing ? And just how would we do that? I have considered that, and rejected it. I'm not talking about people who don't really know and genuinely get their information from whatever their TV or internet or friends tell them and they just go along with it but generally live and let live in the face of differing opinions. I'm talking…

So how do you distinguish between faux "experts" and actual experts? Do you believe that people who write (long form articles, books) about a subject have nothing useful to say?

> So how do you distinguish between faux "experts" and actual experts?

It's not always easy, but in the case of COVID there were a lot of obvious shysters who were slavishly worshipped by the mob.

Opening your eyes and thinking for yourself, and not being desperately and pathetically subservient to "authority" or to mob mentality is a good start.

> Do you believe that people who write (long form articles, books) about a subject have nothing useful to say?

I do not.

Re: Covid-19 Was 'A Preventable Disaster,' WHO-Ordered Report Says

#173

Yeah, if only the organization meant to give accurate epidemiology information hadn't first denied airborne transmission, then denied mask efficacy, and then espoused 6 feet distance bullshido. From the speed of spread of covid, it was clear that it was airborne. I don't need a PHD in epidemiology to not mislead the public.

BTW WHO still says 1m is adequate. Previously they said 1m with no masks, indoors with no ventilation was fine.

That is sad.
Post reply on HN