Live data from Hacker News

How We reduced our Google Maps API cost

blog.cityflo.com

171–172 of 172 posts

Re: How We reduced our Google Maps API cost

#171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We installed hardware on each train to monitor them. So from each moving train we received a coordinate every minute to our servers.

Are you saying that you did that to switch off of google's API?

No. The only part of Googles API we considered was reverse geocoding. The train data was always ours.

Re: How We reduced our Google Maps API cost

#172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you saying that you did that to switch off of google's API?

No. The only part of Googles API we considered was reverse geocoding. The train data was always ours.

Right... but that would mean that what you are querying google for doesn't change. The coordinates of the trains would even only be along their route. Once you have done a reverse lookup on enough points along the route, you should have a pretty dense idea of where the neighborhoods change, right?

I am not sure if I'm missing some big, but it really seems like there wouldn't be an ongoing need for querying google's APIs in this case. Finding the boundaries of the neighborhoods and especially labeling stops should be easy enough to do if it would save so much money.

Post reply on HN