Live data from Hacker News

The Cost of Avoiding Sensitive Questions

papers.ssrn.com

171–180 of 249 posts

Re: The Cost of Avoiding Sensitive Questions

#171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Being a wolf is preferable nonetheless.

wolves are actively hunted by far more dangerous predators though, especially if they are killing sheep.

not in corporate america. i think you missed the metaphor. you arent alone.

Re: The Cost of Avoiding Sensitive Questions

#172
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Being a wolf is preferable nonetheless.

Depends if there are unguarded sheeps nearby, wolves are in extinction in some places, sheeps are not.

what does that have to do with the topic (or this thread)?

Re: The Cost of Avoiding Sensitive Questions

#173
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If your parents are in town and ask where the nearest weed dispensary is, you might pretend not to know, even though you know. That's an unknown known.

But you still know it. Pretending not to know doesn't render it unknown knowledge. To the other person/parents they don't know that you know, but that's looking at knowledge of party a vs. party b, which is mot quite what all this is about. Yo your parents it's still a known unknown (hence why they ask you). I believe the closest to unknown knowns would be temporary loss of knowledge, where at a given moment you don'…

Yeah, I think the add-on is more of a cheeky social commentary.

Biases could also be unknown knowns.

Re: The Cost of Avoiding Sensitive Questions

#174
post #168

My wife was* one of those rare people who just went ahead and asked people whatever was on her mind. This had a curious effect as I often internally winced and thought "you did not just say that". Sometimes I had the impulse to apologize for her or put in a joke to soften the blow. However, curiously, generally people didn't seem to mind or sometimes registered very mild embarrassment. In very rare cases they just av…

It depends on a lot of factors. Unless you extremely lack social skills or are new to a language or culture, a conversation is a continual data gathering, feedback loop for both parties. Here are some examples: 1. How close are you with this person? An issue of trust. 2. What is the context? Friends, coworker, interview, etc. 3. What is the goal? Friendship, small-talk, debate, etc. 4. Who is the audience? student, f…

> I suspect your wife asks these questions to the religious ("theology"), which is a subset (bias).

How did you reach the conclusion she is primarily talking to religious people? That's such a leap I can't even hypothesize your deduction.

Re: The Cost of Avoiding Sensitive Questions

#175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mr. Feyman’s mistake is assuming I’m trying to wash away urine. I touch stuff other than my dick throughout the day. Post-piss is as good a time as any. Not that I would have ever that I felt I owed such an asshole an explanation.

Why is urine getting on your hands? Who designs your (not you specifically) urinals?

Nowhere in OPs comment did he state, or even imply, that he got urine on his hands... The point he was making, which you seem to have missed entirely, is that he ISN'T in fact trying to wash away urine but rather any other nastiness he may have touched throughout the day.

Re: The Cost of Avoiding Sensitive Questions

#176
post #159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I knew a guy like that and he had a very different attitude than most in this situation. The guy I knew was 100% aware of what he was doing. He said he's not poor at all, but chose to live poor to save his money and invest it instead. He said he was on track to retire at 30. The man had laser vision with his eye on the target, can't hate on him for that. He'll be the last one laughing with that "fuck you" money.

But saving money on clothes and hygiene is crazily short-sighted. Bad clean clothes are maybe a couple hundred dollars a year, generously. I sincerely doubt that outweighs having your co-workers dread interacting with you.

It mostly saves time for washing clothes.

Changing clothes weekly was societal norm before washing machines became common. With washing machines Jevons paradox takes effect - instead of just accepting more free personal time with less time taken by washing clothes, we ramped up societal expectations for clean clothes.

Re: The Cost of Avoiding Sensitive Questions

#177

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, it depends on how you define "easily". And any culture that agrees a thing is offensive will probably not feel the offense is taken too easily, because by definition it's the norm. I mean, I was chastised for taking a picture with a Buddha even while I did my best to be polite (I knew taking photos was OK but you had to make sure you weren't standing higher than the Buddha, etc.) - to me it seems kind of arbitr…

Is refill the pot of coffee if you empty it another casualty of technology? I don't think I've worked anywhere in more than a decade that did not have big automate coffee maker that allowed you to choose between a dozen passable options. In that situation you never refill the pot if you empty it, you empty the grinds or pour in more beans if the the machine asks.

I strongly prefer a good old coffee pot to some ridiculous espresso making contraption. Most of the machines you refer to (so far as I'm aware) won't do "big ol' cuppa joe" but you can get about 3 watered down "large" espressos if you want (I don't recommend it).

Lately I just use a French press.

Re: The Cost of Avoiding Sensitive Questions

#178
post #153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s a great story and I’m like your wife in that aspect, but just intentionally. Either way you’re lucky to have someone like that around, it can teach you a lot. I’ve experienced very deep, fulfilling connections with strangers (friend of a friend level) and still haven’t found anyone being embarrassed by these questions, but of course nobody else needs to be around as it can quickly be embarrassing. It can also…

I honestly don't know what a "deep" question sounds like. Is there a list of topics that fall into that category somewhere?

There may be a generic list somewhere but I find them to come naturally from curiosity. Things like:

- Do you like what you do?

- Do you regret this or that?

- Did you study what you always wanted?

- How believing in X helped you?

- What’s the worst memory/event you went through?

- Do you love your parents?

- What’s the best/worst your kids gave to you (emotionally speaking)?

- Do you think you need this or is it a distraction from the important stuff (whatever that is for you)?

Those questions I just came up for nobody in particular (for a close friend those would be pretty normal) and depending of your background, customs, etc they might be deep or might not. They’re not inquisitive and I’m definitely not judging or trying to convince about anything. They do make you think a bit before answering and you learn a lot from those, even from the most superficial people. You need to be very open and accept very harsh and contrary visions from your own in order to benefit from it though, and that’s a long process.

Re: The Cost of Avoiding Sensitive Questions

#179
post #153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s a great story and I’m like your wife in that aspect, but just intentionally. Either way you’re lucky to have someone like that around, it can teach you a lot. I’ve experienced very deep, fulfilling connections with strangers (friend of a friend level) and still haven’t found anyone being embarrassed by these questions, but of course nobody else needs to be around as it can quickly be embarrassing. It can also…

I honestly don't know what a "deep" question sounds like. Is there a list of topics that fall into that category somewhere?

IME a deep conversation's subject actually depends wholly on the individual participants of the conversation. It generally is about a shared topic that is part of the self-identification of at least one party (with a non-identifying party being willing to listen to the identifying party in a manner that the identifying party understands to be respectful).

For example, between an athiest and a thiest, a deep theological question goes into the thiest's religion with the athiest being at minimum willing to listen in a manner the thiest sees as both participatory (not empty 'uh-huh' responses) and also respectful (no blanket denials or insults). Between two thiests, a deep theological question would go into the nature of their spiritualities, comparing and contrasting, or some specific nuance of a shared thiestic belief.

A non-religious deep question can also be positioned on, say, the influence of a specific popular activity. This leads to, for example, heavy and deep debate on the nuances of tennis between two tennis players, or a similarly intimate discussion in which people who suffer from addiction can feel benefit from discussions with other addicts.

Re: The Cost of Avoiding Sensitive Questions

#180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, it depends on how you define "easily". And any culture that agrees a thing is offensive will probably not feel the offense is taken too easily, because by definition it's the norm. I mean, I was chastised for taking a picture with a Buddha even while I did my best to be polite (I knew taking photos was OK but you had to make sure you weren't standing higher than the Buddha, etc.) - to me it seems kind of arbitr…

Is refill the pot of coffee if you empty it another casualty of technology? I don't think I've worked anywhere in more than a decade that did not have big automate coffee maker that allowed you to choose between a dozen passable options. In that situation you never refill the pot if you empty it, you empty the grinds or pour in more beans if the the machine asks.

evidently I asked a sensitive question here, as I got downvoted a couple. Sorry I just thought they had gone the way of the tape cassette, phonogram, typewriters etc.
Post reply on HN