Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Accel" wasn't even mentioned in my original comment. Quit putting words in my mouth.
You said: > They now need to hit $1BB or die trying And alluded to “those investors” being able to take over management of the company. As 1Password is already profitable, and has not been acquired, I’m just trying to figure out what reason you have to make those claims.
>> They now need to hit $1BB or die trying
I didn't, actually. Note the usernames. My reply was regarding the more blanket statement of
>A profitable company is free to disappoint it's investors in any way it chooses.
Also, it's not too unreasonable to assume that a controlling stake was obtained considering that the article said "[this is] a gigantic Series A even by today’s standards", and "The company declined to provide its valuation". Elsewhere in the comments someone mentioned that almost 2/3rds of the money was a "cash-out", rather than an investment to the company. Both statements suggest that a large stake was acquired.