I've given Firefox multiple chances, but we've had no progress with the MacOS performance issues for years. Also, no pinch-to-zoom? 2007 called, and it wants its browser back.
My big Firefox problem is the lack of media key support. I like to hit play or pause on my keyboard and have my streaming music start or top. It's probably the one big thing that makes me run Chrome all the time.
Give Firefox a chance
171–180 of 378 posts
Re: Give Firefox a chance
#172Re: Give Firefox a chance
#173Not much content in this article. A single benchmark which shows nothing of real-life cases. Two minor technical features, one of them already in Chrome beta. Lastly, an appeal to fight Chrome's monopole. Surprisingly, not a word about privacy. I do give Firefox a chance, but it gets tiring. Many years ago, I dropped Firefox's ancestor for Opera 6. The UI and the features were miles ahead (e.g. Mozilla had no tabs).…
try FF nightly. I'm on debian as my daily driver, but nightly works well for me.
Re: Give Firefox a chance
#174I don't recall if I used this but I am running all of the chrome extensions I had in firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/chrome-store-...
Not to mention, their new side view feature is great to have reference and code on a single window.
Re: Give Firefox a chance
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
> make it good Are you arguing that Firefox is not even "good," or just not perfect? (I use Firefox on a Mac all day and the only kind of "resource hunger" I've observed can be pinned to the web pages that it's running.)
In every test I've seen Firefox has beaten Chrome in terms of speed.
Re: Give Firefox a chance
#176Firefox has way better privacy controls than Chrome, however, their track record on security is abysmal. In fact, a 0-day was just found last week targeting Coinbase employees. I wish I could switch to Firefox for privacy reasons, but good security is table stakes and Firefox just doesn't have nearly the security credentials that Chrome does at the moment. This definitely could change in the future, and I hope it doe…
I think this claim deserves a justification. Not saying you're wrong but I'm interested in how to compare browser security.
(Counteranecdote: the HN-popular article [0] which explained the Firefox zero-day, mentioned in it's last paragraph a Chrome zero-day from March 2019.)
[0] https://www.zdnet.com/article/mozilla-patches-firefox-zero-d...
Re: Give Firefox a chance
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is the OOM problem still there even after Quantum release? This was the main turn off factor for me with FF long ago, and when the OOM fails to even trigger, the famous swap thrashing occurs. I tried again with Quantum, but then there were still stability problems causing the whole browser to lock up (just like Edge. But same problem existed in FF since long ago too), so I've never tried it anymore since then. Twice…
Yes. My laptop is a Xeon with 32GB RAM and I can't keep FF alive for more than 4-6 hours. I let upstream (ubuntu) keep packages updated so I'm current.
Re: Give Firefox a chance
#178To me Chrome is IE+Flash+PC Bloatware+Spyware.
Just check your Task Scheduler on windows and see for yourself.
Re: Give Firefox a chance
#179I've given Firefox multiple chances, but we've had no progress with the MacOS performance issues for years. Also, no pinch-to-zoom? 2007 called, and it wants its browser back.
Energy usage on MacOS is another problem, especially compared to safari. I am using safari for a while now, but every now and then you just have to admit chrome does some things much better, like tab management and the dev tools are more user friendly. Which, i realize, is the case for firefox btw. Ff tab management and dev tools are quite nice.