I was working on a personal project recently which involved importing lots of Japanese names into a database for my app. I had originally made a "person" table with columns for "given_name" and "family_name" – but ended up going with a combined "name" column because I couldn't find a reliable way to determine if data from different sources was using the given-first or family-first convention (and I was automatically…
Whenever I'm making an app I do "full name" and "nickname" or "address_as" fields. It solves a lot of problems.
Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
171–180 of 262 posts
Re: Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
#172Pro tip for email communications: please sign any mail you send off. This gives the recipient a clear idea, how he could address you, by just copying from your signature.
Re: Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
#173Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Hello, I'm Cheng Xu. Please call me Cheng." or "Hello, I'm Xu Cheng. Please call me Cheng." solves the problem either way.
Interestingly, in Chinese no-one would call him just 'Cheng'.
Also reasonable:
"I am Doctor Xu."
"I'm Xu Cheng. I prefer my students to call me Doctor Xu."
"Hi, everybody calls me Frazz. Here's my card if you need to reach me."
Re: Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
#174Earlier quoted context omitted.
「劉」is being used as part of a first name in this case.
Yes, but I don't see what the ambiguity is supposed to be. How would you interpret the name such that the 劉 wasn't part of the given name?
Re: Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
#175Re: Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
#176Re: Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
#177I was working on a personal project recently which involved importing lots of Japanese names into a database for my app. I had originally made a "person" table with columns for "given_name" and "family_name" – but ended up going with a combined "name" column because I couldn't find a reliable way to determine if data from different sources was using the given-first or family-first convention (and I was automatically…
[0]:https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-...
Re: Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
#178Earlier quoted context omitted.
「劉」is being used as part of a first name in this case.
Yes, but I don't see what the ambiguity is supposed to be. How would you interpret the name such that the 劉 wasn't part of the given name?
Re: Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
#179English should adopt the French convention of capitalizing the family (last) name. For example, this would make it ABE Shinzo, which would remove ambiguity. When encountering East (thanks for the reminder) Asian (or Hungarian, for that matter) names in emails for example, I'm usually worried about if their "last" name in the directory is their given name and what they should be addressed by or their actual last name.
Any suggestions for surnames with only one letter? They exist, and would still be ambiguous :)
Re: Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
#180English should adopt the French convention of capitalizing the family (last) name. For example, this would make it ABE Shinzo, which would remove ambiguity. When encountering East (thanks for the reminder) Asian (or Hungarian, for that matter) names in emails for example, I'm usually worried about if their "last" name in the directory is their given name and what they should be addressed by or their actual last name.
Falsehoods programmers believe about names:
- Everyone has exactly one well-defined "family name". (In Latin America people have more than one, and some cultrues may go by a single name that isn't a family indicator.)
- In every formal context, the "family name" is how you should address someone. (You do not address the queen of England as "Mrs. Windsor", and Saddam Hussein preferred to be known as "Saddam", which is not a family name.)
(With that said, if it's understood that those assumptions hold, this is a great convention and I endorse it ... at least for the first mention in an article.)